Aim: The first aim of this project was to identify a sample of youth who met different stages of risk for the development of a serious mental illness (SMI) based on a published clinical staging model. The second aim was to determine whether participants allocated to the different stages were a good fit to the model by comparing these groups on a range of clinical measures.
Methods: This two-site longitudinal study recruited 243 youth, ages 12 to 25. The sample included (a) 42 healthy controls, (b) 43 non-help seeking individuals with no mental illness but with some risk of SMI, such as having a first-degree relative with a SMI (stage 0), (c) 52 help-seeking youth experiencing distress and possibly mild symptoms of anxiety or depression (stage 1a) and (d) 108 youth with attenuated symptoms of SMI, such as bipolar disorder or psychosis (stage 1b). Participants completed a range of measures assessing depression, anxiety, mania, suicide ideation, attenuated psychotic symptoms, negative symptoms, anhedonia and beliefs about oneself.
Results: There were no clinical differences between HCs and participants in stage 0. For most of the clinical measures, participants in stage 1b had more severe ratings than participants in stages 1a and 0 and HCs; those in stage 1a had more severe ratings than HCs and stage 0 participants.
Conclusions: These results suggest that the staging process used to allocate participants to various stages is a good fit. That is, the clinical ratings followed an ordering effect consistent with that hypothesized in the staging model.
Keywords: bipolar disorder; clinical high risk; depression; psychosis; risk; schizophrenia; youth.
© 2019 John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.
Family Functioning in Youth At-Risk for Serious Mental IllnessO Santesteban-Echarri et al. Compr Psychiatry 87, 17-24. PMID 30193153.An examination of group mean values demonstrated no difference in family functioning between the different groups with all groups in the healthy functioning range. Howeve …
Youth At-Risk for Serious Mental Illness: Methods of the PROCAN StudyJ Addington et al. BMC Psychiatry 18 (1), 219. PMID 29976184.Outcomes from this study include an improved clinical staging model for SMI and prediction algorithms that can be used by health care providers as decision-support tools …
Social and Role Functioning in Youth at Risk of Serious Mental IllnessS Romanowska et al. Early Interv Psychiatry. PMID 31502422.This study demonstrates that mild to moderate functional impairments are present in young people experiencing subthreshold psychiatric symptoms and distress in the absenc …
Psychological Interventions for Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) in People With Severe Mental IllnessJ Sin et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 1 (1), CD011464. PMID 28116752. - ReviewVery few trials have investigated TFPIs for individuals with SMI and PTSD. Results from trials of TF-CBT are limited and inconclusive regarding its effectiveness on PTSD, …
Collaborative Care Approaches for People With Severe Mental IllnessS Reilly et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (11), CD009531. PMID 24190251. - ReviewThe review did not identify any studies relevant to care of people with schizophrenia and hence there is no evidence available to determine if collaborative care is effec …
Cited by 1 PubMed Central articles
Spanish Validation of the Self-Evaluation of Negative Symptoms Scale SNS in an Adolescent PopulationJF Rodríguez-Testal et al. BMC Psychiatry 19 (1), 327. PMID 31664965.The results back use of the Spanish version of the SNS scale for detection of NS in the general population of adolescents.