Fake news on Twitter during the 2016 U.S. presidential election
- PMID: 30679368
- DOI: 10.1126/science.aau2706
Fake news on Twitter during the 2016 U.S. presidential election
Abstract
The spread of fake news on social media became a public concern in the United States after the 2016 presidential election. We examined exposure to and sharing of fake news by registered voters on Twitter and found that engagement with fake news sources was extremely concentrated. Only 1% of individuals accounted for 80% of fake news source exposures, and 0.1% accounted for nearly 80% of fake news sources shared. Individuals most likely to engage with fake news sources were conservative leaning, older, and highly engaged with political news. A cluster of fake news sources shared overlapping audiences on the extreme right, but for people across the political spectrum, most political news exposure still came from mainstream media outlets.
Copyright © 2019 The Authors, some rights reserved; exclusive licensee American Association for the Advancement of Science. No claim to original U.S. Government Works.
Comment in
-
The misinformation machine.Science. 2019 Jan 25;363(6425):348. doi: 10.1126/science.aaw1315. Science. 2019. PMID: 30679361 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Influence of fake news in Twitter during the 2016 US presidential election.Nat Commun. 2019 Jan 2;10(1):7. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-07761-2. Nat Commun. 2019. PMID: 30602729 Free PMC article.
-
Supersharers of fake news on Twitter.Science. 2024 May 31;384(6699):979-982. doi: 10.1126/science.adl4435. Epub 2024 May 30. Science. 2024. PMID: 38815033
-
Everyday non-partisan fake news: Sharing behavior, platform specificity, and detection.Front Psychol. 2023 May 15;14:1118407. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1118407. eCollection 2023. Front Psychol. 2023. PMID: 37255519 Free PMC article.
-
Measuring the news and its impact on democracy.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Apr 13;118(15):e1912443118. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1912443118. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021. PMID: 33837145 Free PMC article. Review.
-
A short review on susceptibility to falling for fake political news.Curr Opin Psychol. 2020 Dec;36:44-48. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.03.014. Epub 2020 Apr 10. Curr Opin Psychol. 2020. PMID: 32521507 Review.
Cited by
-
Association of Social Network Use With Increased Anxiety Related to the COVID-19 Pandemic in Anesthesiology, Intensive Care, and Emergency Medicine Teams: Cross-Sectional Web-Based Survey Study.JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Sep 24;8(9):e23153. doi: 10.2196/23153. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020. PMID: 32924946 Free PMC article.
-
Computational social science is growing up: why puberty consists of embracing measurement validation, theory development, and open science practices.EPJ Data Sci. 2023;12(1):58. doi: 10.1140/epjds/s13688-023-00434-1. Epub 2023 Dec 12. EPJ Data Sci. 2023. PMID: 38098785 Free PMC article.
-
The distorting effects of producer strategies: Why engagement does not reveal consumer preferences for misinformation.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024 Mar 5;121(10):e2315195121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2315195121. Epub 2024 Feb 27. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024. PMID: 38412133 Free PMC article.
-
The voice of few, the opinions of many: evidence of social biases in Twitter COVID-19 fake news sharing.R Soc Open Sci. 2022 Oct 26;9(10):220716. doi: 10.1098/rsos.220716. eCollection 2022 Oct. R Soc Open Sci. 2022. PMID: 36303937 Free PMC article.
-
Public mass shootings cause large surges in Americans' engagement with gun policy.PNAS Nexus. 2023 Nov 29;2(12):pgad407. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgad407. eCollection 2023 Dec. PNAS Nexus. 2023. PMID: 38111824 Free PMC article.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
