Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2019 Jun;34(6):978-985.
doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4820-0. Epub 2019 Jan 25.

Factors Affecting Adherence in a Pragmatic Trial of Annual Fecal Immunochemical Testing for Colorectal Cancer

Affiliations
Observational Study

Factors Affecting Adherence in a Pragmatic Trial of Annual Fecal Immunochemical Testing for Colorectal Cancer

Carrie M Nielson et al. J Gen Intern Med. 2019 Jun.

Abstract

Background: Colorectal cancer screening by fecal immunochemical test (FIT) reduces the burden of colorectal cancer. However, effectiveness relies on annual adherence, which presents challenges for clinic staff and patients.

Objective: Describe FIT return rates and identify factors associated with FIT adherence over 2 years in a mailed FIT outreach program in federally qualified health centers.

Design: Observational study nested in the Strategies and Opportunities to Stop Colon Cancer in Priority Populations (STOP CRC) trial. Five thousand one hundred ninety-five patients had an initial FIT order and were followed for ≥ 2 years (3574 also had a FIT order in the second year).

Main measures: FIT return percent in each year and patient- and neighborhood-level characteristics associated with FIT adherence.

Key results: Overall, the proportion of FIT orders that were completed was 46% in the patients' first year and 41% in the patients' second year. Of the 5195 patients with a FIT order in year 1, 3574 (69%) also had a FIT order in year 2 (71% of year 1 adherers and 67% of year 1 non-adherers, p = 0.009). Among those with a FIT order in the second year, the FIT return rate was about twice as high among those who were adherent in the first year (952/1674, or 57%) as among those who were not (531/1900, or 28%, p < 0.0001). Patient-level characteristics associated with higher odds of FIT return were a history of FIT screening at baseline, age over 65 (vs 50-65), no current tobacco use, recent receipt of a mammogram or flu vaccine, Asian ancestry (compared to non-Hispanic white), and non-English preference. The only neighborhood factor associated with lower FIT return rate was patient's larger residential city size.

Conclusion: Our findings can inform the customization of programs to promote FIT return among patients who receive care at federally qualified health centers.

Trial registration: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov.

Keywords: cancer; colorectal; fecal immunochemical test; screening.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Dr. Coronado served as a co-investigator on a study funded by Epigenomics and as a principal investigator on a study funded by Quidel Corporation. The studies had no influence on the design, conduct, or reporting of the present study. All remaining authors declare that they do not have a conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Inclusion in the analytic sample of FIT screening adherence. *Window of FIT order consideration: after patient eligibility, after start of clinic intervention activities, and at least 2 years prior to end of clinic’s intervention activities. FIT, fecal immunochemical test; FS, flexible sigmoidoscopy; STOP CRC, Strategies and Opportunities to Stop Colon Cancer in Priority Populations.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Murphy CC, Sandler RS, Sanoff HK, Yang YC, Lund JL, Baron JA. Decrease in Incidence of Colorectal Cancer Among Individuals 50 Years or Older After Recommendations for Population-based Screening. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017;15(6):903–9. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2016.08.037. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Fedewa SA, Ahnen DJ, Meester RGS, Barzi A, et al. Colorectal cancer statistics, 2017. CA Cancer J Clin. 2017;67(3):177–93. doi: 10.3322/caac.21395. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Teng AM, Atkinson J, Disney G, Wilson N, Blakely T. Changing socioeconomic inequalities in cancer incidence and mortality: Cohort study with 54 million person-years follow-up 1981-2011. Int J Cancer. 2017;140(6):1306–16. doi: 10.1002/ijc.30555. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Breen N, Lewis DR, Gibson JT, Yu M, Harper S. Assessing disparities in colorectal cancer mortality by socioeconomic status using new tools: health disparities calculator and socioeconomic quintiles. Cancer Causes Control. 2017;28(2):117–25. doi: 10.1007/s10552-016-0842-2. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. White A, Thompson TD, White MC, Sabatino SA, de Moor J, Doria-Rose PV, et al. Cancer Screening Test Use - United States, 2015. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2017;66(8):201–6. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6608a1. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types