Outcomes of rural trauma patients who undergo damage control laparotomy

Am J Surg. 2019 Sep;218(3):490-495. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2019.01.005. Epub 2019 Jan 10.

Abstract

Background: The majority of motor vehicle crashes occur in a rural setting and those patients have double the mortality of their urban counterparts. These trauma patients are at times stabilized at rural hospitals before transfer to a Level 1 trauma center. The purpose of this study was to determine the outcomes of rural damage control laparotomy used as a means of pre-transfer stabilization.

Methods: A nearly 7-year retrospective review was conducted of rural trauma patients who had laparotomies before or after transfer to Level 1 center. They were grouped into three categories: damage control laparotomy at rural hospital, patients unstable during transfer or stable during transfer with subsequent laparotomy.

Results: Forty-seven patients met study criteria. Overall mortality was significantly different between patients who had damage control laparotomy at a rural hospital (14.3%), were unstable transfer patients (75.0%), and stable transfer patients (3.3%; P < 0.001).

Conclusion: Rural damage control laparotomy may be used as a means of stabilization prior to transfer to a Level 1 center, and in appropriate patients may be life-saving.

Keywords: Damage control laparotomy; Rural transfer; Rural trauma.

MeSH terms

  • Abdominal Injuries / surgery*
  • Accidents, Traffic*
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Female
  • Hospitals, Rural
  • Humans
  • Kansas
  • Laparotomy*
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Patient Transfer*
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Rural Health
  • Trauma Centers
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Young Adult