Large care gaps in primary care management of asthma: a longitudinal practice audit

BMJ Open. 2019 Jan 29;9(1):e022506. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022506.

Abstract

Objectives: Care gaps in asthma may be highly prevalent but are poorly characterised. We sought to prospectively measure adherence to key evidence-based adult asthma practices in primary care, and predictors of these behaviours.

Design: One-year prospective cohort study employing an electronic chart audit.

Setting: Three family health teams (two academic, one community-based) in Ontario, Canada.

Participants: 884 patients (72.1% female; 46.0±17.5 years old) (4199 total visits; 4.8±4.8 visits/patient) assigned to 23 physicians (65% female; practising for 10.0±8.6 years).

Main outcome measures: The primary outcome was the proportion of visits during which practitioners assessed asthma control according to symptom-based criteria. Secondary outcomes included the proportion of: patients who had asthma control assessed at least once; visits during which a controller medication was initiated or escalated; and patients who received a written asthma action plan. Behavioural predictors were established a priori and tested in a multivariable model.

Results: Primary outcome: Providers assessed asthma control in 4.9% of visits and 15.4% of patients. Factors influencing assessment included clinic site (p=0.019) and presenting symptom, with providers assessing control more often during visits for asthma symptoms (35.0%) or any respiratory symptoms (18.8%) relative to other visits (1.6%) (p<0.01).

Secondary outcomes: Providers escalated controller therapy in 3.3% of visits and 15.4% of patients. Factors influencing escalation included clinic site, presenting symptom and prior objective asthma diagnosis. Escalation occurred more frequently during visits for asthma symptoms (21.0%) or any respiratory symptoms (11.9%) relative to other visits (1.5%) (p<0.01) and in patients without a prior objective asthma diagnosis (3.5%) relative to those with (1.3%) (p=0.025). No asthma action plans were delivered.

Conclusions: Major gaps in evidence-based asthma practice exist in primary care. Targeted knowledge translation interventions are required to address these gaps, and can be tailored by leveraging the identified behavioural predictors.

Trial registration number: NCT01070095; Pre-results.

Keywords: asthma; knowledge translation; primary care; quality in health care; respiratory medicine (see thoracic medicine).

Publication types

  • Multicenter Study
  • Observational Study
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Asthma / therapy*
  • Evidence-Based Practice
  • Female
  • Health Services / statistics & numerical data
  • Humans
  • Logistic Models
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Multivariate Analysis
  • Office Visits / statistics & numerical data*
  • Ontario
  • Outcome Assessment, Health Care*
  • Practice Patterns, Physicians' / standards*
  • Primary Health Care / standards*
  • Prospective Studies

Associated data

  • ClinicalTrials.gov/NCT01070095