Bilateral versus Single Internal-Thoracic-Artery Grafts at 10 Years
- PMID: 30699314
- DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1808783
Bilateral versus Single Internal-Thoracic-Artery Grafts at 10 Years
Abstract
Background: Multiple arterial grafts may result in longer survival than single arterial grafts after coronary-artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery. We evaluated the use of bilateral internal-thoracic-artery grafts for CABG.
Methods: We randomly assigned patients scheduled for CABG to undergo bilateral or single internal-thoracic-artery grafting. Additional arterial or vein grafts were used as indicated. The primary outcome was death from any cause at 10 years. The composite of death from any cause, myocardial infarction, or stroke was a secondary outcome.
Results: A total of 1548 patients were randomly assigned to undergo bilateral internal-thoracic-artery grafting (the bilateral-graft group) and 1554 to undergo single internal-thoracic-artery grafting (the single-graft group). In the bilateral-graft group, 13.9% of the patients received only a single internal-thoracic-artery graft, and in the single-graft group, 21.8% of the patients also received a radial-artery graft. Vital status was not known for 2.3% of the patients at 10 years. In the intention-to-treat analysis at 10 years, there were 315 deaths (20.3% of the patients) in the bilateral-graft group and 329 deaths (21.2%) in the single-graft group (hazard ratio, 0.96; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.82 to 1.12; P=0.62). Regarding the composite outcome of death, myocardial infarction, or stroke, there were 385 patients (24.9%) with an event in the bilateral-graft group and 425 patients (27.3%) with an event in the single-graft group (hazard ratio, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.79 to 1.03).
Conclusions: Among patients who were scheduled for CABG and had been randomly assigned to undergo bilateral or single internal-thoracic-artery grafting, there was no significant between-group difference in the rate of death from any cause at 10 years in the intention-to-treat analysis. Further studies are needed to determine whether multiple arterial grafts provide better outcomes than a single internal-thoracic-artery graft. (Funded by the British Heath Foundation and others; Current Controlled Trials number, ISRCTN46552265 .).
Comment in
-
Coronary Bypass Surgery - An ART for Dedicated Surgeons.N Engl J Med. 2019 Jan 31;380(5):489-491. doi: 10.1056/NEJMe1814681. N Engl J Med. 2019. PMID: 30699308 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Randomized Trial of Bilateral versus Single Internal-Thoracic-Artery Grafts.N Engl J Med. 2016 Dec 29;375(26):2540-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1610021. Epub 2016 Nov 14. N Engl J Med. 2016. PMID: 27959712 Clinical Trial.
-
Outcomes following surgical revascularization with single versus bilateral internal thoracic arterial grafts in patients with left main coronary artery disease undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting: insights from the EXCEL trial†.Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2019 Mar 1;55(3):501-510. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezy291. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2019. PMID: 30165487 Clinical Trial.
-
Bilateral versus single internal thoracic coronary artery bypass grafting: the ART RCT.Southampton (UK): National Institute for Health and Care Research; 2023 Oct. Southampton (UK): National Institute for Health and Care Research; 2023 Oct. PMID: 37931047 Free Books & Documents. Review.
-
Single versus bilateral internal thoracic artery grafts with concomitant saphenous vein grafts for multivessel coronary artery bypass grafting: effects on mortality and event-free survival.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2004 May;127(5):1408-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2003.10.006. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2004. PMID: 15116000
-
Randomized comparison of the clinical outcome of single versus multiple arterial grafts: the ROMA trial-rationale and study protocol.Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2017 Dec 1;52(6):1031-1040. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezx358. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2017. PMID: 29059371 Review.
Cited by
-
Improvement of the outcome of the saphenous vein graft when connected to the internal thoracic artery.Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Oct 18;11:1478166. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1478166. eCollection 2024. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024. PMID: 39494236 Free PMC article.
-
Procedural risk factors for deep and organ/space surgical site infection post-coronary artery bypass graft surgery.Antimicrob Steward Healthc Epidemiol. 2024 Sep 9;4(1):e120. doi: 10.1017/ash.2024.374. eCollection 2024. Antimicrob Steward Healthc Epidemiol. 2024. PMID: 39257421 Free PMC article.
-
Bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting in robotic beating-heart totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass: 10-year outcomes.Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2024 Jul 31;13(4):354-363. doi: 10.21037/acs-2024-rcabg-0016. Epub 2024 Jul 18. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2024. PMID: 39157183 Free PMC article.
-
Total Arterial Revascularization in Diabetic Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Jun 25;24(6):183. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2406183. eCollection 2023 Jun. Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2023. PMID: 39077537 Free PMC article.
-
Conduits and Strategies for Arterial Revascularization in CABG.Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Jun 30;24(7):188. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2407188. eCollection 2023 Jul. Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2023. PMID: 39077016 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical