Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
, 13, 8
eCollection

Patient and Staff Experiences of Quality in Swedish Forensic Psychiatric Care: A Repeated Cross-Sectional Survey With Yearly Sampling at Two Clinics

Affiliations

Patient and Staff Experiences of Quality in Swedish Forensic Psychiatric Care: A Repeated Cross-Sectional Survey With Yearly Sampling at Two Clinics

Mikael Selvin et al. Int J Ment Health Syst.

Abstract

Background: Systematic efforts to improve the quality, safety and value of health care have increased over the last decades. Even so, it is hard to choose priorities and to know when the desired results are reached, especially in forensic psychiatric care where there can be a discrepancy between patient and staff expectations of what good quality of care is and how it should be reached. The aim of the present study was to describe and compare patient and staff experiences of quality of care in two forensic psychiatric clinics over a period of 4 years.

Methods: A quantitative design was used and yearly between 2011 and 2014, a total of 105 questionnaires were answered by patients and 598 by staff.

Results: The sample consisted of four different groups; patient and staff in Clinic A and Clinic B respectively. The repeated measurements showed that quality of care, as described by the patients, varied over time, with significant changes over the 4 years. The staff evaluations of the quality of care were more stable over time in both clinics compared with the patients. Generally, the staff rated the quality as being better than the patients but these differences tended to decrease when efforts were made to improve the care.

Conclusions: It is important to highlight both what staff and patients perceive as both high and low quality care. With regular measurements and sufficient resources, training, support and leadership, the chances of successful improvement work increase. This knowledge is important in forensic nursing practice, for teaching and for management and decision makers in the constant work of improving forensic psychiatric care.

Keywords: Forensic nursing; Forensic psychiatry; Quality improvement.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Differences in perceived quality of care between patients at Clinic A and Clinic B in QPC-FIP. A positive difference indicates greater perceived quality of care in Clinic A than in Clinic B. Negative differences indicate the opposite
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Differences in perceived quality of care between staff at Clinic A and Clinic B in QPC-FIPS. A positive difference indicates greater perceived quality of care in Clinic A than in Clinic B. Negative differences indicate the opposite

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by 1 PubMed Central articles

References

    1. Nedopil N, Taylor P, Gunn J. Forensic psychiatry in Europe: the perspective of the ghent group. Int J Psychiatry Clin Pract. 2015;19(2):80–83. doi: 10.3109/13651501.2014.967700. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gordon H, Lindqvist P. Forensic psychiatry in Europe. Psychiatr Bull. 2007;31(11):421–424. doi: 10.1192/pb.bp.107.014803. - DOI
    1. Caplan CA. Nursing staff and patient perceptions of the ward atmosphere in a maximum security forensic hospital. Arch Psychiatr Nurs. 1993;7(1):23–29. doi: 10.1016/0883-9417(93)90019-S. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hörberg U. To be the subject of care or the object of correction. Forensic psychiatric care and the power of tradition. Dissertation, Institute of Health Science and Social Work, Växjö. 2008. https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:205815/FULLTEXT01.pdf. Accessed 17 Aug 2017.
    1. Olsson H, Schön UK. Reducing violence in forensic care—how does it resemble the domains of a recovery-oriented care? J Ment Health. 2016;25(6):506–511. doi: 10.3109/09638237.2016.1139075. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources

Feedback