Robotic versus laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: a large multi-institutional analysis (ROSULA Collaborative Group)
- PMID: 30734072
- DOI: 10.1007/s00345-019-02657-2
Robotic versus laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: a large multi-institutional analysis (ROSULA Collaborative Group)
Abstract
Objective: To compare the outcomes of robotic radical nephrectomy (RRN) to those of laparoscopic radical nephrectomy (LRN) for large renal masses.
Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of RRN and LRN cases performed for large (≥ cT2) renal masses from 2004 to 2017 and collected in the multi-institutional international database (ROSULA: RObotic SUrgery for LArge renal masses). Peri-operative, functional, and oncologic outcomes were compared between each approach. Descriptive analyses were performed and presented as medians with interquartile ranges. Inverse probability of treatment weighting-adjusted multivariable analyses were used to identify predictors of peri-operative complications. Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox regression models were used to assess survival outcomes.
Results: A total of 941 patients (RRN = 404, LRN = 537) were identified. There was no difference in terms of gender, age, and clinical tumor size. Over the study period, RRN had an annual increase of 11.75% (95% CI [7.34, 17.01] p < 0.001) and LRN had an annual decline of 5.39% (95% CI [-6.94, -3.86] p < 0.001). Patients undergoing RRN had higher BMI (27.6 [IQR 24.8-31.1] vs. 26.5 [24.1-30.0] kg/m2, p < 0.01). Operative duration was longer for RRN (185.0 [150.0-237.2] vs. 126 [90.8-180.0] min, p < 0.001). Length of stay was shorter for RRN (3.0 [2.0-4.0] vs. 5.0 [4.0-7.0] days, p < 0.001). RRN cases presented more advanced disease (higher pathologic staging [pT3-4 52.5 vs. 24.2%, p < 0.001], histologic grade [high grade 49.3 vs. 30.4%, p < 0.001], and rate of nodal disease [pN1 5.4 vs. 1.9%, p < 0.01]). Surgical approach did not represent an independent risk factor for peri-operative complications (OR 1.81 95% CI [0.97-3.39], adjusted p = 0.2). The main study limitation is the retrospective design.
Conclusions: This study represents the largest known multi-center comparison between RRN and LRN. The two procedures seem to offer similar peri-operative outcomes. Notably, RRN has been increasingly utilized, especially in the setting of more advanced and surgically challenging disease without increasing the risk of peri-operative complications.
Keywords: Comparative outcomes; Complications; Laparoscopic; Radical nephrectomy; Robotic.
Similar articles
-
A Literature Review of Perioperative Outcomes of Robotic Radical Nephrectomy (RRN) Versus Laparoscopic Radical Nephrectomy (LRN) for Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC).Cureus. 2023 Nov 19;15(11):e49077. doi: 10.7759/cureus.49077. eCollection 2023 Nov. Cureus. 2023. PMID: 38125252 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Robotic versus laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: comparative analysis and cost considerations.Can J Urol. 2016 Oct;23(5):8435-8440. Can J Urol. 2016. PMID: 27705727
-
Comparison of Perioperative Outcomes for Radical Nephrectomy Based on Surgical Approach for Masses Greater Than 10 cm.J Endourol. 2021 Dec;35(12):1785-1792. doi: 10.1089/end.2020.1164. J Endourol. 2021. PMID: 34148404
-
A prospective comparison of laparoscopic and robotic radical nephrectomy for T1-2N0M0 renal cell carcinoma.World J Urol. 2009 Feb;27(1):89-94. doi: 10.1007/s00345-008-0321-9. Epub 2008 Aug 13. World J Urol. 2009. PMID: 18704439 Clinical Trial.
-
Robotic radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review.BMC Urol. 2014 Sep 18;14:75. doi: 10.1186/1471-2490-14-75. BMC Urol. 2014. PMID: 25234265 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
A Literature Review of Perioperative Outcomes of Robotic Radical Nephrectomy (RRN) Versus Laparoscopic Radical Nephrectomy (LRN) for Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC).Cureus. 2023 Nov 19;15(11):e49077. doi: 10.7759/cureus.49077. eCollection 2023 Nov. Cureus. 2023. PMID: 38125252 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Robotic Partial vs Radical Nephrectomy for Clinical T3a Tumors: A Narrative Review.J Endourol. 2023 Sep;37(9):978-985. doi: 10.1089/end.2023.0173. Epub 2023 Jul 31. J Endourol. 2023. PMID: 37358403 Review.
-
Case report and literature review: Robot-assisted laparoscopic left renal mucinous cystadenocarcinoma radical nephrectomy.Front Surg. 2023 Jan 6;9:1053852. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.1053852. eCollection 2022. Front Surg. 2023. PMID: 36684278 Free PMC article.
-
Retrospective Comparison of Clinical and Economic Outcomes of Non-Donor Patients Undergoing Radical Nephrectomy Using One of Two Different Linear Stapler Technologies for Transection of the Renal Vessels: Fixed-Height Gripping Surface Reloads vs Variable-Height Reloads.Med Devices (Auckl). 2022 Sep 2;15:317-328. doi: 10.2147/MDER.S372629. eCollection 2022. Med Devices (Auckl). 2022. PMID: 36092953 Free PMC article.
-
Healthcare Resource Utilization After Surgical Treatment of Cancer: Value of Minimally Invasive Surgery.Surg Endosc. 2022 Oct;36(10):7549-7560. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09189-8. Epub 2022 Apr 21. Surg Endosc. 2022. PMID: 35445834 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
