HIV Prevention Practices and Non-Federal Funding Among U.S. States and Non-State Regions: A Survey of HIV/AIDS Directors

AIDS Educ Prev. 2019 Feb;31(1):82-94. doi: 10.1521/aeap.2019.31.1.82.

Abstract

We surveyed U.S. HIV/AIDS directors or designees in states and non-state regions, regarding factors influencing HIV viral suppression: (1) non-federal prevention funding; (2) contacting newly reported patients and providers, for care linkage and partner services; (3) follow-up of non-received viral load reports, to identify untreated patients; and (4) genotype/phenotype surveillance, to monitor drug resistance. The survey was conducted April-July 2015; 50 (87.7%) participated. Eighty percent of jurisdictions contacted all newly reported patients; 60% contacted all providers. HIV resistance tests were reportable in 38%; 66% contacted providers and/or patients about missed viral loads. Non-federal funding was significantly associated with annual diagnoses (p = .0001) and population (p = .0002), but not with other factors studied. Many jurisdictions lacked non-federal funding (28%), or experienced unrestored reductions since 2008 (33%). Jurisdictions' funding and preventive practices varied greatly. HIV viral suppression could be enhanced by restoring (or establishing) non-federal prevention funding, and by more standardized surveillance/outreach practices.

Keywords: HIV; funding; outreach; public health; standardization; surveillance.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • AIDS Serodiagnosis / economics*
  • Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome
  • Adult
  • Female
  • Financing, Government / economics*
  • Financing, Government / trends
  • HIV Infections / prevention & control*
  • Humans
  • Mass Screening
  • Physician Executives*
  • Public Health Administration*
  • Surveys and Questionnaires
  • United States
  • Viral Load