Psychometric evaluation of the Russian version of the flourishing scale in a sample of older adults living in Siberia
- PMID: 30744656
- PMCID: PMC6371512
- DOI: 10.1186/s12955-019-1100-6
Psychometric evaluation of the Russian version of the flourishing scale in a sample of older adults living in Siberia
Abstract
Background: The development of measures of psychological functioning has received less attention in Russia compared to other countries. Moreover, despite the growing interest in the psychological well-being of older adults, there is a lack of research on this segment of the population in Siberia. Therefore, in this study we aimed to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Russian version of the Flourishing Scale (FS) and to measure psychological functioning in a sample of older adults living in Siberia.
Methods: The FS was translated and adapted to Russian language and culture using the back-translation procedure. The Russian version was administered to 851 older adults (aged from 65 to 93 years, mean = 75.3; female = 510). A principal axis factor analysis (PFA) and a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) were used to assess the structural validity. Cronbach's alpha coefficients (internal consistency) and item-total correlations were also analysed. To test the convergent validity, the FS was compared with other scales assessing mental well-being.
Results: The PFA and the CFA showed that the FS had good psychometric properties. A one-factor structure was a good model of fit, even if some items had a low loading (ranging between 0.39 and 0.80). The Cronbach's alpha value was 0.82 and the Cronbach's alpha values if an item were deleted ranged from 0.78 to 0.81. The item-total correlation coefficients ranged from 0.54 to 0.76. The FS also showed good convergent and divergent validity with other scales (correlation coefficients ranging from 0.39 to 0.54). The mean flourishing score (40.9) reported by the older adults in our sample is lower than that reported in previous studies.
Conclusions: The Russian version of the FS seems to have good psychometric properties and to be a valid and reliable instrument to evaluate flourishing among Russian older adults. This study provides the first evaluation of an instrument that Russian researchers and policymakers can use to better understand the determinants of successful ageing in this society. Future studies should further assess the validity and reliability of the FS and should generalize these results to different groups (e.g., adolescent or workers).
Keywords: Flourishing scale; Older adults; Psychological well-being; Psychometric assessment; Russian version.
Conflict of interest statement
Ethics approval and consent to participate
At the time the study was conducted, there was no ethics committee at the university. However, the study was conducted in accordance with the Helsinki declaration and its later amendments. All researchers and interviewers involved in the study adhered to the ethical standards of the Helsinki declaration. Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants prior to the interview. All respondents were informed that their participation was voluntary and anonymous, and that they could withdraw from the interview at any time.
Consent for publication
The manuscript does not contain any individual person’s data in any form.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interest.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Psychometric properties the Iranian version of Older People's Quality Of Life questionnaire (OPQOL).Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2018 Sep 5;16(1):174. doi: 10.1186/s12955-018-1002-z. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2018. PMID: 30185194 Free PMC article.
-
Persian version of the brief Older People's Quality of Life questionnaire (OPQOL-brief): the evaluation of the psychometric properties.Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020 Oct 7;18(1):327. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01586-8. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020. PMID: 33028355 Free PMC article.
-
The Chinese version of the Perceived Stress Questionnaire: development and validation amongst medical students and workers.Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020 Mar 13;18(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01307-1. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020. PMID: 32169070 Free PMC article.
-
Psychometric evaluation of the patient perspective on care and rehabilitation scale in geriatric patients.Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2019 Mar-Apr;81:84-90. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2018.11.013. Epub 2018 Dec 1. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2019. PMID: 30529761 Review.
-
[Psychometric properties of the Stigma Scale of Epilepsy].Zh Nevrol Psikhiatr Im S S Korsakova. 2019;119(11. Vyp. 2):29-33. doi: 10.17116/jnevro201911911229. Zh Nevrol Psikhiatr Im S S Korsakova. 2019. PMID: 32207728 Review. Russian.
Cited by
-
Thriving amidst adversity: Flourishing and grit in Ukrainian college students with strong life purpose before and after the onset of the Russian war in Ukraine.Heliyon. 2023 Nov 3;9(11):e21456. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e21456. eCollection 2023 Nov. Heliyon. 2023. PMID: 38027736 Free PMC article.
-
Sociodemographic predictors of flourishing among older adults in rural and urban Mongolia.Sci Rep. 2023 Jan 31;13(1):1756. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-28791-x. Sci Rep. 2023. PMID: 36720987 Free PMC article.
-
Flourishing Scale: Adaptation and Evidence of Validity in a Chilean High School Context.Front Psychol. 2022 Mar 31;13:795452. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.795452. eCollection 2022. Front Psychol. 2022. PMID: 35432075 Free PMC article.
-
Adaptation and Measurement Invariance by Gender of the Flourishing Scale in a Colombian Sample.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Mar 6;18(5):2664. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18052664. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021. PMID: 33800910 Free PMC article.
-
Measurement Invariance of the Flourishing Scale among a Large Sample of Canadian Adolescents.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Oct 25;17(21):7800. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17217800. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020. PMID: 33113772 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Diener E, Wirtz D, Tov W, Kim-Prieto C, Choi DW, Oishi S, Biswas-Diener R. New well-being measures: short scales to assess flourishing and positive and negative feelings. Soc Indic Res. 2010. 10.1007/s11205-009-9493-y.
-
- Cooke PJ, Melchert TP, Connor K. Measuring well-being: a review of instruments. Couns Psychol. 2016. 10.1177/0011000016633507.
-
- Strizhitskaya O. Aging in Russia. The Gerontologist. 2016. 10.1093/geront/gnw007. - PubMed
-
- Ryan RM, Deci EL. On happiness and human potentials: a review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annu Rev Psychol. 2001. 10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.141. - PubMed
-
- Abbott P, Sapsford R. Life-satisfaction in post-soviet Russia and Ukraine. J Happiness Stud. 2006. 10.1007/s10902-005-5563-2.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
