Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
, 17 (2), e3000117

Reliable Novelty: New Should Not Trump True


Reliable Novelty: New Should Not Trump True

Björn Brembs. PLoS Biol.


Although a case can be made for rewarding scientists for risky, novel science rather than for incremental, reliable science, novelty without reliability ceases to be science. The currently available evidence suggests that the most prestigious journals are no better at detecting unreliable science than other journals. In fact, some of the most convincing studies show a negative correlation, with the most prestigious journals publishing the least reliable science. With the credibility of science increasingly under siege, how much longer can we afford to reward novelty at the expense of reliability? Here, I argue for replacing the legacy journals with a modern information infrastructure that is governed by scholars. This infrastructure would allow renewed focus on scientific reliability, with improved sort, filter, and discovery functionalities, at massive cost savings. If these savings were invested in additional infrastructure for research data and scientific code and/or software, scientific reliability would receive additional support, and funding woes-for, e.g., biological databases-would be a concern of the past.

Conflict of interest statement

The author has declared that no competing interests exist.

Similar articles

See all similar articles


    1. Rutherford E. LXXIX. The scattering of α and β particles by matter and the structure of the atom. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science. 1911;21: 669–688.
    1. Einstein A. Ist die Trägheit eines Körpers von seinem Energieinhalt abhängig? Ann Phys. 1905;323: 639–641.
    1. Freedman SJ, Clauser JF. Experimental Test of Local Hidden-Variable Theories. Phys Rev Lett. 1972;28: 938–941.
    1. Nelson JA. The power of stereotyping and confirmation bias to overwhelm accurate assessment: the case of economics, gender, and risk aversion. Journal of Economic Methodology. 2014;21: 211–231.
    1. Pines JM. Profiles in patient safety: confirmation bias in emergency medicine. Acad Emerg Med. 2006;13: 90–94. 10.1197/j.aem.2005.07.028 - DOI - PubMed

Grant support

The author received no specific funding for this work.