Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Feb 13:364:l231.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.l231.

Enterovirus as trigger of coeliac disease: nested case-control study within prospective birth cohort

Affiliations

Enterovirus as trigger of coeliac disease: nested case-control study within prospective birth cohort

Christian R Kahrs et al. BMJ. .

Abstract

Objective: To determine whether infection with human enterovirus or adenovirus, both common intestinal viruses, predicts development of coeliac disease.

Design: Case-control study nested within Norwegian birth cohort recruited between 2001 and 2007 and followed to September 2016.

Setting: Norwegian population.

Participants: Children carrying the HLA genotype DR4-DQ8/DR3-DQ2 conferring increased risk of coeliac disease.

Exposures: Enterovirus and adenovirus detected using real time polymerase chain reaction in monthly stool samples from age 3 to 36 months.

Main outcome measure: Coeliac disease diagnosed according to standard criteria. Coeliac disease antibodies were tested in blood samples taken at age 3, 6, 9, and 12 months and then annually. Adjusted odds ratios from mixed effects logistic regression model were used to assess the relation between viral infections before development of coeliac disease antibodies and coeliac disease.

Results: Among 220 children, and after a mean of 9.9 (SD 1.6) years, 25 children were diagnosed as having coeliac disease after screening and were matched to two controls each. Enterovirus was found in 370 (17%) of 2135 samples and was significantly more frequent in samples collected before development of coeliac disease antibodies in cases than in controls (adjusted odds ratio 1.49, 95% confidence interval 1.07 to 2.06; P=0.02). The association was restricted to infections after introduction of gluten. High quantity samples (>100 000 copies/μL) (adjusted odds ratio 2.11, 1.24 to 3.60; P=0.01) and long lasting infections (>2 months) (2.16, 1.16 to 4.04; P=0.02) gave higher risk estimates. Both the commonly detected enterovirus species Enterovirus A and Enterovirus B were significantly associated with coeliac disease. The association was not found for infections during or after development of coeliac disease antibodies. Adenovirus was not associated with coeliac disease.

Conclusions: In this longitudinal study, a higher frequency of enterovirus, but not adenovirus, during early childhood was associated with later coeliac disease. The finding adds new information on the role of viral infections in the aetiology of coeliac disease.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form at www.icmje.org/coi_disclosure.pdf (available on request from the corresponding author) and declare: no support from any organisation for the submitted work other than that described above; no financial relationships with any organisations that might have an interest in the submitted work in the previous three years; no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1
Enrolment of study sample. “Invited” children are those who were still actively participating (delivering samples, questionnaires) at start of coeliac disease sub-study and were invited to participate; “participated” are those who consented to participate and were screened for coeliac disease antibodies. *Two cases were excluded from analyses, one owing to missing stool samples and one owing to incorrect use of diagnostic criteria. †Children with positive coeliac disease antibodies at first screening test but for whom follow-up did not confirm coeliac disease diagnosis (n=10) were excluded from further analyses; control children with high antibody titres (>10 times cut-off) (n=2) in old samples but with normal values at screening were excluded and replaced by new controls selected using same matching criteria. ‡One matched control was excluded from analysis owing to missing stool samples
Fig 2
Fig 2
Timeline of study
Fig 3
Fig 3
Development of coeliac disease antibodies. Figure illustrating definition of before, during, and after development of coeliac disease antibodies. Dots represent faecal samples. Primary analysis included only stool samples collected up to age at last antibody negative blood sample for cases and corresponding age for matched controls. Pre-planned sub-analyses explored same association for stool samples collected during development of coeliac disease antibodies (between last negative and first antibody positive blood sample) and samples collected after first antibody positive blood sample

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Green PH, Cellier C. Celiac disease. N Engl J Med 2007;357:1731-43. 10.1056/NEJMra071600 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Romanos J, Rosén A, Kumar V, et al. PreventCD Group Improving coeliac disease risk prediction by testing non-HLA variants additional to HLA variants. Gut 2014;63:415-22. 10.1136/gutjnl-2012-304110 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mårild K, Vistnes M, Tapia G, et al. Midpregnancy and cord blood immunologic biomarkers, HLA genotype, and pediatric celiac disease. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2017;139:1696-8. 10.1016/j.jaci.2016.10.016 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Liu E, Lee HS, Aronsson CA, et al. TEDDY Study Group Risk of pediatric celiac disease according to HLA haplotype and country. N Engl J Med 2014;371:42-9. 10.1056/NEJMoa1313977 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Agardh D, Lee HS, Kurppa K, et al. TEDDY Study Group Clinical features of celiac disease: a prospective birth cohort. Pediatrics 2015;135:627-34. 10.1542/peds.2014-3675 - DOI - PMC - PubMed