Spatial Distribution of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Surface Expansion and Correlation With Maximum Diameter and Volume Growth

Abstract

Background: Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) growth rate, measured as maximum diameter (Dmax) change over time, is used as a surrogate marker of rupture risk. However, AAA expansion presents significant spatial variability. We aim to record the spatial distribution of regional wall surface expansion.

Methods: Thirty AAAs were retrospectively studied. Each AAA had one baseline and at least one follow-up computed tomography scan. Three-dimensional AAA models were reconstructed, and change in Dmax and total aneurysm volume was recorded to calculate annual growth rates. Regional surface growth was quantified using the VascForm algorithm, which is based on nonrigid point cloud registration and iterative closest point analysis. Maximum and average surface growths were calculated and correlated with the diameter/volume growth rates. Furthermore, to identify potential correlation between maximum thrombus (intraluminal thrombus) thickness and maximum surface growth, as well as between peak wall stress (PWS) and surface growth, their colocalization was examined.

Results: The median average annual surface growth was 6% (0%-28%), and the maximum surface growth 24% (11%-238%). There was strong evidence of a moderate correlation between Dmax and average as well as maximum surface growth. Regarding volumes, there was strong evidence of a very strong association with average surface growth rate and a moderate association with maximum surface growth rate (rho: 0.91, P < 0.001; rho: 0.7, P < 0.001, respectively). In 51.6% of the follow-ups, maximum surface growth occurred away from Dmax site. Sixteen cases presented maximum surface growth away and fifteen at the region of maximum initial intraluminal thrombus thickness. AAAs in the former group had significantly thinner initial intraluminal thrombus thickness (11.3 vs 19.5 mm, P < 0.001) than those in the latter. Apart from a single case, maximum surface growth did not occur at the PWS region.

Conclusions: More than half of the lesions display maximum growth away from Dmax, suggesting that a more accurate method of analyzing AAA growth needs to be established in clinical practice that will take into account local surface growth.