Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Apr 25;63(5):e02312-18.
doi: 10.1128/AAC.02312-18. Print 2019 May.

The Widely Used Antimicrobial Triclosan Induces High Levels of Antibiotic Tolerance In Vitro and Reduces Antibiotic Efficacy up to 100-Fold In Vivo

Affiliations

The Widely Used Antimicrobial Triclosan Induces High Levels of Antibiotic Tolerance In Vitro and Reduces Antibiotic Efficacy up to 100-Fold In Vivo

Corey Westfall et al. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. .

Abstract

The antimicrobial triclosan is used in a wide range of consumer products ranging from toothpaste, cleansers, socks, and baby toys. A bacteriostatic inhibitor of fatty acid synthesis, triclosan is extremely stable and accumulates in the environment. Approximately 75% of adults in the United States have detectable levels of the compound in their urine, with a sizeable fraction of individuals (>10%) having urine concentrations equal to or greater than the minimal inhibitory concentration for Escherichia coli and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Previous work has identified connections between defects in fatty acid synthesis and accumulation of the alarmone guanosine tetraphosphate (ppGpp), which has been repeatedly associated with antibiotic tolerance and persistence. Based on these data, we hypothesized that triclosan exposure may inadvertently drive bacteria into a state in which they are able to tolerate normally lethal concentrations of antibiotics. Here we report that clinically relevant concentrations of triclosan increased E. coli and MRSA tolerance to bactericidal antibiotics as much as 10,000-fold in vitro and reduced antibiotic efficacy up to 100-fold in a mouse urinary tract infection model. Genetic analysis indicated that triclosan-mediated antibiotic tolerance requires ppGpp synthesis but is independent of growth. These data highlight an unexpected and certainly unintended consequence of adding high concentrations of antimicrobials in consumer products, supporting an urgent need to reevaluate the costs and benefits of the prophylactic use of triclosan and other bacteriostatic compounds.

Keywords: antimicrobial agents; antimicrobial safety; genetics; urinary tract infection.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIG 1
FIG 1
Triclosan induces tolerance to multiple antibiotics. E. coli (MG1655) were cultured to an OD600 of 0.2, split, and cultured for an additional 30 min with (+T) or without (–T) 200 ng/ml triclosan. The indicated bactericidal antibiotics were then added, and the cells were cultured for an additional 2 to 20 h prior to dilution plating. Each experiment was replicated three independent times, with only representative data shown.
FIG 2
FIG 2
Kinetic analysis of triclosan-induced persistence. E. coli (MG1655) and MRSA (FPR3757) cells were cultured to an OD600 of 0.2, split and cultured for an additional 30 min with (black line, closed squares) or without triclosan (gray line, open squares). (A to C) At t = 0, 100 ng/ml (A) or 1,000 ng/ml ciprofloxacin (B) was added to the E. coli cultures, and 50 ng/ml vancomycin was added to the MRSA cultures (C). (D) The relative persistence in the presence of triclosan (CFU+T/CFU–T) was calculated from the 4- and 20-h time points. Values are the means of three independent biological replicates, with error bars representing the SEM. Asterisks represent significant differences between triclosan-treated and nontreated samples calculated using a Student two-tailed t test (*, P < 0.05).
FIG 3
FIG 3
ppGpp is needed for triclosan induced tolerance. (A) Cell viability of MG1655 and ppGpp0 E. coli with (+T) or without (–T) pretreatment with triclosan after challenge with antibiotic. (B) Growth curves of MG1655 (black curve) or ppGpp0 (gray curve) in LB with (dashed lines) or without (solid lines) triclosan. (C) Cell viability of MG1655 and ppGpp0 E. coli with (+T) or without (–T) pretreatment with spectinomycin after challenge with antibiotic. Values are means of three independent biological replicates, with error bars representing the SEM. Asterisks represent significant differences between triclosan-treated and nontreated samples calculated using a Student two-tailed t test (*, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.001).
FIG 4
FIG 4
Triclosan reduces ciprofloxacin efficacy up to 100-fold in a mouse UTI model. For each round of the experiment, 15 mice were given water-containing triclosan (100 μg/ml) for 21 days, and 15 control mice received plain water. At 21 days, all mice were infected with E. coli UTI89 (∼5 × 107 CFU). At 24 h postinfection, 10 mice from each group were given 25 mg/kg of ciprofloxacin intraperitoneally. At 48 h postinfection, urine samples (A) were obtained, and then the mice were sacrificed and bladders (B) were harvested. To compare the mice groups, Mann-Whitney U test was used, a P value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant (*, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.005; ***, P < 0.0005; ns, values were not statistically different). The horizontal bar represents the median value. The horizontal broken line represents the limit of detection of viable bacteria. The data are from three independent experiments. (C) Free triclosan levels measured by LC-MS/MS of triclosan in untreated and treated mouse urine. (A total of 45 mice were untreated, and 45 mice were treated; these mice were divided into three independent experiments. Urine samples from three to four mice were pooled for triclosan analysis.) The horizontal broken line represents the limit of quantification of triclosan.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Food and Drug Administration. 2016. Safety and effectiveness of consumer antiseptics; topical antimicrobial drug products for over-the-counter human use. Final Rule Fed Regist 81:61106–61130. - PubMed
    1. McEwen SA, Fedorka-Cray PJ. 2002. Antimicrobial use and resistance in animals. Clin Infect DIS 34:S93–S106. doi:10.1086/340246. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Yazdankhah SP, Scheie AA, Høiby EA, Lunestad B-T, Heir E, Fotland TØ, Naterstad K, Kruse H. 2006. Triclosan and antimicrobial resistance in bacteria: an overview. Microb Drug Resist 12:83–90. doi:10.1089/mdr.2006.12.83. - DOI - PubMed
    1. McMurry LM, Oethinger M, Levy SB. 1998. Triclosan targets lipid synthesis. Nature 394:531–532. doi:10.1038/28970. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Maiden MM, Hunt AMA, Zachos MP, Gibson JA, Hurwitz ME, Mulks MH, Waters CM. 2018. Triclosan is an aminoglycoside adjuvant for eradication of Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 62:e00146-18. doi:10.1128/AAC.00146-18. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources