Electronic Health Record Adoption and Nurse Reports of Usability and Quality of Care: The Role of Work Environment
- PMID: 30786302
- PMCID: PMC6382496
- DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1678551
Electronic Health Record Adoption and Nurse Reports of Usability and Quality of Care: The Role of Work Environment
Abstract
Background: Despite evidence suggesting higher quality and safer care in hospitals with comprehensive electronic health record (EHR) systems, factors related to advanced system usability remain largely unknown, particularly among nurses. Little empirical research has examined sociotechnical factors, such as the work environment, that may shape the relationship between advanced EHR adoption and quality of care.
Objective: The objective of this study was to examine the independent and joint effects of comprehensive EHR adoption and the hospital work environment on nurse reports of EHR usability and nurse-reported quality of care and safety.
Methods: This study was a secondary analysis of nurse and hospital survey data. Unadjusted and adjusted logistic regression models were used to assess the relationship between EHR adoption level, work environment, and a set of EHR usability and quality/safety outcomes. The sample included 12,377 nurses working in 353 hospitals.
Results: In fully adjusted models, comprehensive EHR adoption was associated with lower odds of nurses reporting poor usability outcomes, such as dissatisfaction with the system (odds ratio [OR]: 0.75; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.61-0.92). The work environment was associated with all usability outcomes with nurses in better environments being less likely to report negatively. Comprehensive EHRs (OR: 0.83; 95% CI: 0.71-0.96) and better work environments (OR: 0.47; 95% CI: 0.42-0.52) were associated with lower odds of nurses reporting fair/poor quality of care, while poor patient safety grade was associated with the work environment (OR: 0.50; 95% CI: 0.46-0.54), but not EHR adoption level.
Conclusion: Our findings suggest that adoption of a comprehensive EHR is associated with more positive usability ratings and higher quality of care. We also found that-independent of EHR adoption level-the hospital work environment plays a significant role in how nurses evaluate EHR usability and whether EHRs have their intended effects on improving quality and safety of care.
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.
Conflict of interest statement
None declared.
Similar articles
-
Electronic Health Record Usability: Associations With Nurse and Patient Outcomes in Hospitals.Med Care. 2021 Jul 1;59(7):625-631. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001536. Med Care. 2021. PMID: 33797506 Free PMC article.
-
Physicians' and nurses' experiences on EHR usability: Comparison between the professional groups by employment sector and system brand.Int J Med Inform. 2020 Feb;134:104018. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.104018. Epub 2019 Oct 24. Int J Med Inform. 2020. PMID: 31835158
-
The effect of hospital electronic health record adoption on nurse-assessed quality of care and patient safety.J Nurs Adm. 2011 Nov;41(11):466-72. doi: 10.1097/NNA.0b013e3182346e4b. J Nurs Adm. 2011. PMID: 22033316 Free PMC article.
-
Electronic health records implementation: an evaluation of information system impact and contingency factors.Int J Med Inform. 2014 Nov;83(11):779-96. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2014.06.011. Epub 2014 Jul 22. Int J Med Inform. 2014. PMID: 25085286 Review.
-
Mind the Gap. A systematic review to identify usability and safety challenges and practices during electronic health record implementation.Appl Clin Inform. 2016 Nov 16;7(4):1069-1087. doi: 10.4338/ACI-2016-06-R-0105. Appl Clin Inform. 2016. PMID: 27847961 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Perceptions of hospital electronic health record (EHR) training, support, and patient safety by staff position and tenure.BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Aug 20;24(1):955. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11322-3. BMC Health Serv Res. 2024. PMID: 39164672 Free PMC article.
-
The Impact of Digital Hospitals on Patient and Clinician Experience: Systematic Review and Qualitative Evidence Synthesis.J Med Internet Res. 2024 Mar 11;26:e47715. doi: 10.2196/47715. J Med Internet Res. 2024. PMID: 38466978 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Adoption of Electronic Health Record Among Substance Use Disorder Treatment Programs: Nationwide Cross-Sectional Survey Study.J Med Internet Res. 2023 Dec 14;25:e45238. doi: 10.2196/45238. J Med Internet Res. 2023. PMID: 38096006 Free PMC article.
-
Adoption of electronic health record systems to enhance the quality of healthcare in low-income countries: a systematic review.BMJ Health Care Inform. 2023 Jun;30(1):e100704. doi: 10.1136/bmjhci-2022-100704. BMJ Health Care Inform. 2023. PMID: 37308185 Free PMC article.
-
Workflow Improvement of Electronic Health Record Usage in a Tertiary Pediatric Burns Clinic.Appl Clin Inform. 2023 Mar;14(2):205-211. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1763289. Epub 2023 Mar 15. Appl Clin Inform. 2023. PMID: 36921596 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Adler-Milstein J, Jha A K. HITECH Act drove large gains in hospital electronic health record adoption. Health Aff (Millwood) 2017;36(08):1416–1422. - PubMed
-
- Henry J, Pylypchuk Y, Searchy T, Patel V. Washington, DC: Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology; 2016. Adoption of Electronic Health Record Systems among U.S. Non-Federal Acute Care Hospitals: 2008–2015. ONC Data Brief 35.
-
- Walker-Czyz A.The impact of an integrated electronic health record adoption on nursing care quality J Nurs Adm 201646(7–8):366–372. - PubMed
