Objective: To compare the outcomes of MitraClip and surgical mitral repair in low-intermediate risk elderly patients affected by degenerative mitral regurgitation (DMR).
Methods: We retrospectively selected patients aged ≥75 years, with Society of Thoracic Surgeons Predicted Risk Of Mortality (STS-PROM) <8%, submitted to MitraClip (n = 100) or isolated surgical repair (n = 206) for DMR at 2 centers between January 2005 and May 2017. To adjust for baseline imbalances, we used a propensity score model for average treatment effect on survival.
Results: After weighting, MitraClip showed fewer postoperative complications (P < .05) but increased residual mitral regurgitation (MR) ≥2 (27.0% vs 2.8%, P < .001) compared with surgery. One-year survival was greater after MitraClip compared with surgery (97.6% vs 95.3%, hazard ratio [HR], 0.09; confidence interval [CI], 0.02-0.37, P = .001), whereas 5-year survival was lower (34.5% vs 82.2% respectively, HR, 4.12; CI, 2.31-7.34, P < .001). Greater STS-PROM (HR, 1.18; CI, 1.12-1.24, P < .001) and MR ≥3+ recurrence (HR, 2.18; CI, 1.07-4.48, P = .033) were associated with reduced survival. 5-year MR ≥3+ was more frequent after MitraClip compared with surgery: 36.9% versus 3.9%, odds ratio, 11.4; CI, 4.40-29.68, P < .001.
Conclusions: In elderly patients affected by DMR and STS-PROM <8%, the average effect of MitraClip resulted in lower acute postoperative complications and improved 1-year survival compared with surgery. However, MitraClip was associated with greater MR recurrence and reduced survival beyond 1 year. Long-term survival was impaired by patients' greater risk profile and MR recurrence. Early results are promising, but in the setting of operable patients with life expectancy beyond 1 year, the quality bar for transcatheter mitral repair needs to be raised.
Keywords: Mitraclip; degenerative; mitral regurgitation; mitral repair; prolapse; transcatheter.
Copyright © 2019 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.