Predicting Bleeding Risk to Guide Aspirin Use for the Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease: A Cohort Study
- PMID: 30802900
- DOI: 10.7326/M18-2808
Predicting Bleeding Risk to Guide Aspirin Use for the Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease: A Cohort Study
Abstract
Background: Many prognostic models for cardiovascular risk can be used to estimate aspirin's absolute benefits, but few bleeding risk models are available to estimate its likely harms.
Objective: To develop prognostic bleeding risk models among persons in whom aspirin might be considered for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease (CVD).
Design: Prospective cohort study.
Setting: New Zealand primary care.
Participants: The study cohort comprised 385 191 persons aged 30 to 79 years whose CVD risk was assessed between 2007 and 2016. Those with indications for or contraindications to aspirin and those who were already receiving antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy were excluded.
Measurements: For each sex, Cox proportional hazards models were developed to predict major bleeding risk; participants were censored at the earliest of the date on which they first met an exclusion criterion, date of death, or study end date (30 June 2017). The main models included the following predictors: demographic characteristics (age, ethnicity, and socioeconomic deprivation), clinical measurements (systolic blood pressure and ratio of total-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol), family history of premature CVD, medical history (smoking, diabetes, bleeding, peptic ulcer disease, cancer, chronic liver disease, chronic pancreatitis, or alcohol-related conditions), and medication use (nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents, corticosteroids, and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors).
Results: During 1 619 846 person-years of follow-up, 4442 persons had major bleeding events (of which 313 [7%] were fatal). The main models predicted a median 5-year bleeding risk of 1.0% (interquartile range, 0.8% to 1.5%) in women and 1.1% (interquartile range, 0.7% to 1.6%) in men. Plots of predicted-against-observed event rates showed good calibration throughout the risk range.
Limitation: Hemoglobin level, platelet count, and body mass index were excluded from the main models because of high numbers of missing values, and the models were not externally validated in non-New Zealand populations.
Conclusion: Prognostic bleeding risk models were developed that can be used to estimate the absolute bleeding harms of aspirin among persons in whom aspirin is being considered for the primary prevention of CVD.
Primary funding source: The Health Research Council of New Zealand.
Comment in
-
Are We There Yet? Another Milepost in the Journey to Identify Appropriate Candidates for Aspirin Primary Prevention.Ann Intern Med. 2019 Mar 19;170(6):411-413. doi: 10.7326/M19-0416. Epub 2019 Feb 26. Ann Intern Med. 2019. PMID: 30802898 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Annual Risk of Major Bleeding Among Persons Without Cardiovascular Disease Not Receiving Antiplatelet Therapy.JAMA. 2018 Jun 26;319(24):2507-2520. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.8194. JAMA. 2018. PMID: 29946729 Free PMC article.
-
Personalized Prediction of Cardiovascular Benefits and Bleeding Harms From Aspirin for Primary Prevention: A Benefit-Harm Analysis.Ann Intern Med. 2019 Oct 15;171(8):529-539. doi: 10.7326/M19-1132. Epub 2019 Sep 17. Ann Intern Med. 2019. PMID: 31525775
-
Are the benefits of aspirin likely to exceed the risk of major bleeds among people in whom aspirin is recommended for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease?N Z Med J. 2018 Oct 26;131(1484):19-25. N Z Med J. 2018. PMID: 30359352
-
Bleeding Risks With Aspirin Use for Primary Prevention in Adults: A Systematic Review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.Ann Intern Med. 2016 Jun 21;164(12):826-35. doi: 10.7326/M15-2112. Epub 2016 Apr 12. Ann Intern Med. 2016. PMID: 27064261 Review.
-
Aspirin Use to Prevent Cardiovascular Disease and Colorectal Cancer: An Updated Decision Analysis for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force [Internet].Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2022 Apr. Report No.: 21-05283-EF-2. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2022 Apr. Report No.: 21-05283-EF-2. PMID: 35648884 Free Books & Documents. Review.
Cited by
-
Risk of Bleeding and Venous Thromboembolism after Colorectal Cancer Surgery in Patients with and without Type 2 Diabetes: A Danish Cohort Study.TH Open. 2024 Mar 26;8(1):e146-e154. doi: 10.1055/a-2275-9590. eCollection 2024 Jan. TH Open. 2024. PMID: 38532940 Free PMC article.
-
[Comparison of aspirin treatment strategies for primary prevention of cardiovascular diseases: A decision-analytic Markov modelling study].Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2023 Jun 18;55(3):480-487. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2023.03.014. Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2023. PMID: 37291924 Free PMC article. Chinese.
-
Optimal antiplatelet therapy for patients after antiplatelet therapy induced gastrointestinal bleeding: timing.Intern Emerg Med. 2023 Aug;18(5):1385-1396. doi: 10.1007/s11739-023-03299-4. Epub 2023 May 17. Intern Emerg Med. 2023. PMID: 37195594
-
Risk of major bleeding by ethnicity and socioeconomic deprivation among 488,107 people in primary care: a cohort study.BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2021 Apr 23;21(1):206. doi: 10.1186/s12872-021-01993-9. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2021. PMID: 33892644 Free PMC article.
-
Summary of Updated Recommendations for Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease in Women: JACC State-of-the-Art Review.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020 May 26;75(20):2602-2618. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.03.060. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020. PMID: 32439010 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous