Evaluation of Two Dosing Regimens for Nivolumab in Combination With Ipilimumab in Patients With Advanced Melanoma: Results From the Phase IIIb/IV CheckMate 511 Trial
- PMID: 30811280
- PMCID: PMC6455714
- DOI: 10.1200/JCO.18.01998
Evaluation of Two Dosing Regimens for Nivolumab in Combination With Ipilimumab in Patients With Advanced Melanoma: Results From the Phase IIIb/IV CheckMate 511 Trial
Abstract
Purpose: Nivolumab 1 mg/kg plus ipilimumab 3 mg/kg (NIVO1+IPI3) is approved for first-line treatment of patients with advanced melanoma in several countries. We conducted a phase IIIb/IV study (CheckMate 511) to determine if nivolumab 3 mg/kg plus ipilimumab 1 mg/kg (NIVO3+IPI1) improves the safety profile of the combination.
Patients and methods: Patients (N = 360) age 18 years or older with previously untreated, unresectable stage III or IV melanoma were randomly assigned 1:1 to NIVO3+IPI1 or NIVO1+IPI3 once every 3 weeks for four doses. After 6 weeks, all patients received NIVO 480 mg once every 4 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary end point was a comparison of the incidence of treatment-related grade 3 to 5 adverse events (AEs) between groups. Secondary end points included descriptive analyses of objective response rate, progression-free survival, and overall survival. The study was not designed to formally demonstrate noninferiority of NIVO3+IPI1 to NIVO1+IPI3 for efficacy end points.
Results: At a minimum follow-up of 12 months, incidence of treatment-related grade 3 to 5 AEs was 34% with NIVO3+IPI1 versus 48% with NIVO1+IPI3 ( P = .006). In descriptive analyses, objective response rate was 45.6% in the NIVO3+IPI1 group and 50.6% in the NIVO1+IPI3 group, with complete responses in 15.0% and 13.5% of patients, respectively. Median progression-free survival was 9.9 months in the NIVO3+IPI1 group and 8.9 months in the NIVO1+IPI3 group. Median overall survival was not reached in either group.
Conclusion: The CheckMate 511 study met its primary end point, demonstrating a significantly lower incidence of treatment-related grade 3-5 AEs with NIVO3+IPI1 versus NIVO1+IPI3. Descriptive analyses showed that there were no meaningful differences between the groups for any efficacy end point, although longer follow up may help to better characterize efficacy outcomes.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02714218.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Nivolumab Alone and With Ipilimumab in Previously Treated Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma: CheckMate 032 Nivolumab 1 mg/kg Plus Ipilimumab 3 mg/kg Expansion Cohort Results.J Clin Oncol. 2019 Jul 1;37(19):1608-1616. doi: 10.1200/JCO.19.00538. Epub 2019 May 17. J Clin Oncol. 2019. PMID: 31100038 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Nivolumab with or without ipilimumab in patients with recurrent glioblastoma: results from exploratory phase I cohorts of CheckMate 143.Neuro Oncol. 2018 Apr 9;20(5):674-686. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/nox208. Neuro Oncol. 2018. PMID: 29106665 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Nivolumab plus ipilimumab or nivolumab alone versus ipilimumab alone in advanced melanoma (CheckMate 067): 4-year outcomes of a multicentre, randomised, phase 3 trial.Lancet Oncol. 2018 Nov;19(11):1480-1492. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30700-9. Epub 2018 Oct 22. Lancet Oncol. 2018. PMID: 30361170 Clinical Trial.
-
Cost-effectiveness of nivolumab in advanced melanoma: a drug review.Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2021 Feb;21(1):13-28. doi: 10.1080/14737167.2021.1845144. Epub 2020 Dec 6. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2021. PMID: 33225752 Review.
-
Pharmacological interventions for melanoma: Comparative analysis using bayesian meta-analysis.Oncotarget. 2016 Dec 6;7(49):80855-80871. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.12644. Oncotarget. 2016. PMID: 27764796 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Review of recent advances in managing periocular skin malignancies.Front Oncol. 2024 Mar 4;14:1275930. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1275930. eCollection 2024. Front Oncol. 2024. PMID: 38500654 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Remodeling the tumor-immune microenvironment by anti-CTLA4 blockade enhanced subsequent anti-PD-1 efficacy in advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma.NPJ Precis Oncol. 2024 Mar 6;8(1):65. doi: 10.1038/s41698-024-00558-1. NPJ Precis Oncol. 2024. PMID: 38448521 Free PMC article.
-
Immune checkpoint inhibitors in metastatic melanoma therapy (Review).Med Int (Lond). 2024 Feb 9;4(2):13. doi: 10.3892/mi.2024.137. eCollection 2024 Mar-Apr. Med Int (Lond). 2024. PMID: 38410760 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Clinical and translational attributes of immune-related adverse events.Nat Cancer. 2024 Feb 15. doi: 10.1038/s43018-024-00730-3. Online ahead of print. Nat Cancer. 2024. PMID: 38360861 Review.
-
The Effect of Non-Overlapping Somatic Mutations in BRAF, NRAS, NF1, or CKIT on the Incidence and Outcome of Brain Metastases during Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy of Metastatic Melanoma.Cancers (Basel). 2024 Jan 30;16(3):594. doi: 10.3390/cancers16030594. Cancers (Basel). 2024. PMID: 38339344 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
