Antibiotic management of urinary tract infection in elderly patients in primary care and its association with bloodstream infections and all cause mortality: population based cohort study
- PMID: 30814048
- PMCID: PMC6391656
- DOI: 10.1136/bmj.l525
Antibiotic management of urinary tract infection in elderly patients in primary care and its association with bloodstream infections and all cause mortality: population based cohort study
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the association between antibiotic treatment for urinary tract infection (UTI) and severe adverse outcomes in elderly patients in primary care.
Design: Retrospective population based cohort study.
Setting: Clinical Practice Research Datalink (2007-15) primary care records linked to hospital episode statistics and death records in England.
Participants: 157 264 adults aged 65 years or older presenting to a general practitioner with at least one diagnosis of suspected or confirmed lower UTI from November 2007 to May 2015.
Main outcome measures: Bloodstream infection, hospital admission, and all cause mortality within 60 days after the index UTI diagnosis.
Results: Among 312 896 UTI episodes (157 264 unique patients), 7.2% (n=22 534) did not have a record of antibiotics being prescribed and 6.2% (n=19 292) showed a delay in antibiotic prescribing. 1539 episodes of bloodstream infection (0.5%) were recorded within 60 days after the initial UTI. The rate of bloodstream infection was significantly higher among those patients not prescribed an antibiotic (2.9%; n=647) and those recorded as revisiting the general practitioner within seven days of the initial consultation for an antibiotic prescription compared with those given a prescription for an antibiotic at the initial consultation (2.2% v 0.2%; P=0.001). After adjustment for covariates, patients were significantly more likely to experience a bloodstream infection in the deferred antibiotics group (adjusted odds ratio 7.12, 95% confidence interval 6.22 to 8.14) and no antibiotics group (8.08, 7.12 to 9.16) compared with the immediate antibiotics group. The number needed to harm (NNH) for occurrence of bloodstream infection was lower (greater risk) for the no antibiotics group (NNH=37) than for the deferred antibiotics group (NNH=51) compared with the immediate antibiotics group. The rate of hospital admissions was about double among cases with no antibiotics (27.0%) and deferred antibiotics (26.8%) compared with those prescribed immediate antibiotics (14.8%; P=0.001). The risk of all cause mortality was significantly higher with deferred antibiotics and no antibiotics than with immediate antibiotics at any time during the 60 days follow-up (adjusted hazard ratio 1.16, 95% confidence interval 1.06 to 1.27 and 2.18, 2.04 to 2.33, respectively). Men older than 85 years were particularly at risk for both bloodstream infection and 60 day all cause mortality.
Conclusions: In elderly patients with a diagnosis of UTI in primary care, no antibiotics and deferred antibiotics were associated with a significant increase in bloodstream infection and all cause mortality compared with immediate antibiotics. In the context of an increase of Escherichia coli bloodstream infections in England, early initiation of recommended first line antibiotics for UTI in the older population is advocated.
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form at http://www.icmje.org/coi_disclosure.pdf and declare: grants support from NIHR and Dr Foster Intelligence for the submitted work; no financial relationships with any organisations that might have an interest in the submitted work in the previous three years; no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work except for MG who declares working as an epidemiologist at GSK in therapeutic areas not related to the submitted work.
Figures
Comment in
-
Antibiotic prescribing in primary care.BMJ. 2019 Feb 27;364:l780. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l780. BMJ. 2019. PMID: 30814116 No abstract available.
-
In older patients with UTIs, deferring or not prescribing antibiotics was linked to adverse outcomes.Ann Intern Med. 2019 Jun 18;170(12):JC70. doi: 10.7326/ACPJ201906180-070. Ann Intern Med. 2019. PMID: 31207623 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Antibiotic prescribing for lower UTI in elderly patients in primary care and risk of bloodstream infection: A cohort study using electronic health records in England.PLoS Med. 2020 Sep 21;17(9):e1003336. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003336. eCollection 2020 Sep. PLoS Med. 2020. PMID: 32956399 Free PMC article.
-
Probability of sepsis after infection consultations in primary care in the United Kingdom in 2002-2017: Population-based cohort study and decision analytic model.PLoS Med. 2020 Jul 23;17(7):e1003202. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003202. eCollection 2020 Jul. PLoS Med. 2020. PMID: 32702001 Free PMC article.
-
Prescription of antibiotics for urinary tract infection in general practice in Denmark.Scand J Prim Health Care. 2019 Mar;37(1):83-89. doi: 10.1080/02813432.2019.1569425. Epub 2019 Jan 28. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2019. PMID: 30689491 Free PMC article.
-
Dipsticks and diagnostic algorithms in urinary tract infection: development and validation, randomised trial, economic analysis, observational cohort and qualitative study.Health Technol Assess. 2009 Mar;13(19):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-73. doi: 10.3310/hta13190. Health Technol Assess. 2009. PMID: 19364448 Review.
-
Alarm signs and antibiotic prescription in febrile children in primary care: an observational cohort study.Br J Gen Pract. 2013 Jul;63(612):e437-44. doi: 10.3399/bjgp13X669158. Br J Gen Pract. 2013. PMID: 23834880 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Strategies for older people living in care homes to prevent urinary tract infection: the StOP UTI realist synthesis.Health Technol Assess. 2024 Oct;28(68):1-139. doi: 10.3310/DADT3410. Health Technol Assess. 2024. PMID: 39432412 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Economic Burden of Community-Acquired Antibiotic-Resistant Urinary Tract Infections: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2024 Oct 9;10:e53828. doi: 10.2196/53828. JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2024. PMID: 39382601 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Risk factors for urinary tract infection in elderly patients with type 2 diabetes: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.PLoS One. 2024 Sep 26;19(9):e0310903. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0310903. eCollection 2024. PLoS One. 2024. PMID: 39325710 Free PMC article.
-
A step forward in the diagnosis of urinary tract infections: from machine learning to clinical practice.Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2024 Jul 25;24:533-541. doi: 10.1016/j.csbj.2024.07.018. eCollection 2024 Dec. Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2024. PMID: 39220685 Free PMC article.
-
Trends in urine sampling rates of general practice patients with suspected lower urinary tract infections in England, 2015-2022: a population-based study.BMJ Open. 2024 Aug 6;14(8):e084485. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084485. BMJ Open. 2024. PMID: 39107033 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Wagenlehner FM, Lichtenstern C, Rolfes C, et al. Diagnosis and management for urosepsis. Int J Urol 2013;20:963-70. - PubMed
-
- Martin GS, Mannino DM, Moss M. The effect of age on the development and outcome of adult sepsis. Crit Care Med 2006;34:15-21. 10.1097/01.CCM.0000194535.82812.BA - DOI - PubMed
-
- Cove-Smith A, Almond MK. Management of urinary tract infections in the elderly. Trends in Urology, Gynaecol Sex Health 2007;12:31-4.