Association between interpregnancy interval and adverse birth outcomes in women with a previous stillbirth: an international cohort study
- PMID: 30827781
- DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32266-9
Association between interpregnancy interval and adverse birth outcomes in women with a previous stillbirth: an international cohort study
Abstract
Background: WHO recommends that women wait at least 2 years after a livebirth and at least 6 months after a miscarriage or induced abortion before conceiving again, to reduce the risk of adverse birth outcomes in the subsequent pregnancy. No recommendation exists for the optimal interval after a stillbirth. We investigated the association between interpregnancy interval after stillbirth and birth outcomes in the subsequent pregnancy.
Methods: In this international cohort study, we used data from birth records from Finland (1987-2016), Norway (1980-2015), and Western Australia (1980-2015). Consecutive singleton pregnancies in women whose most recent pregnancy had ended in stillbirth of at least 22 weeks' gestation were included in the analysis. Interpregnancy interval was defined as the time between the end of pregnancy (delivery date) and the start of the next pregnancy (delivery date of next pregnancy minus gestational age at birth). We calculated odds ratios (ORs) for stillbirth, preterm birth, and small-for-gestational-age birth by interpregnancy interval by country, adjusted for maternal age, parity, decade of delivery, and gestational length of the previous pregnancy. A fixed-effects meta-analysis was used to estimate pooled ORs.
Findings: We identified 14 452 births in women who had a stillbirth in the previous pregnancy; median interpregnancy interval after stillbirth was 9 months (IQR 4-19). 9109 (63%) women conceived within 12 months of the stillbirth. Of the 14 452 births, 228 (2%) were stillbirths, 2532 (18%) were preterm births, and 1284 (9%) were small-for-gestational-age births. Compared with an interpregnancy interval of 24-59 months, intervals shorter than 12 months were not associated with increased odds of subsequent stillbirth (pooled adjusted OR 1·09 [95% CI 0·63-1·91] for <6 months; 0·90 [0·47-1·71] for 6-11 months), preterm birth (0·91 [0·75-1·11] for <6 months; 0·91 [0·74-1·11] for 6-11 months), or small-for-gestational-age birth (0·66 [0·51-0·85] for <6 months; 0·64 [0·48-0·84] for 6-11 months). Further, we noted no difference in the association between interpregnancy interval and birth outcomes by gestational length of the previous stillbirth.
Interpretation: Conception within 12 months of a stillbirth was common and was not associated with increased risk of adverse outcomes in the subsequent pregnancy. These findings could be used when counselling women who are planning future pregnancies after a stillbirth and for informing future recommendations for pregnancy spacing in a high-income setting.
Funding: National Health and Medical Research Council (Australia), and Research Council of Norway.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
Interpregnancy interval after stillbirth: modifiable, but does it matter?Lancet. 2019 Apr 13;393(10180):1482-1483. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32430-9. Epub 2019 Feb 28. Lancet. 2019. PMID: 30827786 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Developing evidence-based recommendations for optimal interpregnancy intervals in high-income countries: protocol for an international cohort study.BMJ Open. 2019 Jan 29;9(1):e027941. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027941. BMJ Open. 2019. PMID: 30700492 Free PMC article.
-
Interpregnancy interval and adverse pregnancy outcomes among pregnancies following miscarriages or induced abortions in Norway (2008-2016): A cohort study.PLoS Med. 2022 Nov 22;19(11):e1004129. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004129. eCollection 2022 Nov. PLoS Med. 2022. PMID: 36413512 Free PMC article.
-
Birth spacing and risk of adverse pregnancy and birth outcomes: A systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis.Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2023 Dec;102(12):1618-1633. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14648. Epub 2023 Sep 7. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2023. PMID: 37675816 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Association of Short Interpregnancy Interval With Pregnancy Outcomes According to Maternal Age.JAMA Intern Med. 2018 Dec 1;178(12):1661-1670. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.4696. JAMA Intern Med. 2018. PMID: 30383085 Free PMC article.
-
Interpregnancy interval following miscarriage and adverse pregnancy outcomes: systematic review and meta-analysis.Hum Reprod Update. 2017 Mar 1;23(2):221-231. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmw043. Hum Reprod Update. 2017. PMID: 27864302 Review.
Cited by
-
Interpregnancy interval, air pollution, and the risk of low birth weight: a retrospective study in China.BMC Public Health. 2024 Sep 17;24(1):2529. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19711-3. BMC Public Health. 2024. PMID: 39289643 Free PMC article.
-
Short inter-pregnancy interval and birthweight: a reappraisal based on a follow-up study of all women in Norway with two singleton deliveries during 1970-2019.Eur J Epidemiol. 2024 Aug;39(8):905-914. doi: 10.1007/s10654-024-01148-y. Epub 2024 Aug 24. Eur J Epidemiol. 2024. PMID: 39179945 Free PMC article.
-
Interpregnancy interval and adverse perinatal outcomes: A within-individual comparative method.Health Sci Rep. 2024 Aug 19;7(8):e2313. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.2313. eCollection 2024 Aug. Health Sci Rep. 2024. PMID: 39166119 Free PMC article.
-
Effects of short inter-pregnancy/birth interval on adverse perinatal outcomes in Asia-Pacific region: A systematic review and meta-analysis.PLoS One. 2024 Jul 31;19(7):e0307942. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0307942. eCollection 2024. PLoS One. 2024. PMID: 39083535 Free PMC article.
-
Interpregnancy interval and early infant neurodevelopment: the role of maternal-fetal glucose metabolism.BMC Med. 2024 Jan 2;22(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s12916-023-03191-0. BMC Med. 2024. PMID: 38169387 Free PMC article.
