Cost-Effectiveness of Reclassifying Triptans in Australia: Application of an Economic Evaluation Approach to Regulatory Decisions

Value Health. 2019 Mar;22(3):293-302. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2018.09.2840. Epub 2018 Dec 24.

Abstract

Background: Migraine is a common, chronic, disabling headache disorder. Triptans, used as an acute treatment for migraine, are available via prescription in Australia. An Australian Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) committee rejected reclassifying sumatriptan and zolmitriptan from prescription medicine to pharmacist-only between 2005 and 2009, largely on the basis of concerns about patient risk. Nevertheless, pharmacist-only triptans may reduce migraine duration and free up healthcare resources.

Objectives: To estimate the cost-effectiveness of reclassifying triptans from prescription-only to pharmacist-only in Australia.

Methods: The study design included decision-analytic modeling combining data from various sources. Behavior before and after reclassification was estimated using medical practitioner and patient surveys and also administrative data. Health outcomes included migraine frequency and duration as well as adverse events (AEs) discussed by the TGA committee. Efficacy and AEs were estimated using randomized controlled trials and observational studies.

Results: Reclassifying triptans will reduce migraine duration but increase AEs. This will result in 337 quality-adjusted life-years gained at an increased cost of A$5.9 million over 10 years for all Australian adults older than 15 years (19.6 million). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was estimated to be A$17 412/quality-adjusted life-year gained.

Conclusions: The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio is likely to be considered cost-effective by Australian decision makers. Serotonin syndrome, a key concern of the TGA committee, had little impact on the results. Further research is needed regarding pharmacist-only triptan use by migraineurs currently using over-the-counter medicines and by nonmigraineurs, the efficacy of triptans, and the risk of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular AEs and chronic headaches with triptans.

Keywords: 5-HT receptor agonist; behind-the-counter; cost-effectiveness; economics; legislation; nonprescription drugs; over-the-counter; prescription drugs; triptan.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Australia / epidemiology
  • Cost-Benefit Analysis / methods*
  • Cost-Benefit Analysis / trends
  • Drug and Narcotic Control / economics
  • Drug and Narcotic Control / methods*
  • General Practitioners / economics
  • Humans
  • Migraine Disorders / drug therapy*
  • Migraine Disorders / economics*
  • Migraine Disorders / epidemiology
  • Nonprescription Drugs / classification
  • Nonprescription Drugs / economics
  • Nonprescription Drugs / therapeutic use
  • Oxazolidinones / classification*
  • Oxazolidinones / economics
  • Oxazolidinones / therapeutic use
  • Pharmacists / economics
  • Prescription Drugs / classification
  • Prescription Drugs / economics
  • Prescription Drugs / therapeutic use
  • Serotonin 5-HT1 Receptor Agonists / classification
  • Serotonin 5-HT1 Receptor Agonists / economics
  • Serotonin 5-HT1 Receptor Agonists / therapeutic use
  • Sumatriptan / classification*
  • Sumatriptan / economics
  • Sumatriptan / therapeutic use
  • Tryptamines / classification*
  • Tryptamines / economics
  • Tryptamines / therapeutic use

Substances

  • Nonprescription Drugs
  • Oxazolidinones
  • Prescription Drugs
  • Serotonin 5-HT1 Receptor Agonists
  • Tryptamines
  • zolmitriptan
  • Sumatriptan