Management of Grassland-like Wildflower Strips Sown on Nutrient-rich Arable Soils: The Role of Grass Density and Mowing Regime
- PMID: 30868313
- DOI: 10.1007/s00267-019-01153-y
Management of Grassland-like Wildflower Strips Sown on Nutrient-rich Arable Soils: The Role of Grass Density and Mowing Regime
Abstract
Wildflower strips (WS) are proposed in many European countries as a strategy to enhance biodiversity and ecosystem services in arable fields. To create and maintain WS on nutrient-rich cultivated soils reveals challenging. Flowered species may be outcompeted by grasses due to high phosphorus content in soil. We studied during 5 years seed mixture (grass density in the seed mix) and mowing regime influenced the ability of WS to provide environmental benefits (flower provision for insects and landscape purposes, reduction of soil nutrient load) and respond to farmer concerns (noxious weed promotion, forage production). Lowered grass density increased flower abundance, but not diversity, only in the first 3 years. In the last 2 years mowing effects became determinant. Flower cover and richness were the highest under the twice-a-year mowing regime. This regime also increased forage quantity and quality. Flower colour diversity was conversely the highest where mowing occurred every two years. Potassium in the soil decreased under the twice-a-year mowing regime. Other nutrients were not affected. No management option kept noxious weed to an acceptable level after 5 years. This supports the need to test the efficacy of specific management practices such as selective clipping or spraying. Mowing WS twice a year was retained as the most favourable treatment to maintain species-rich strips with an abundant flower provision. It however implies to mow in late June, i.e. at the peak of insect abundance. It is therefore suggested to keep an unmown refuge zone when applying this management regime.
Keywords: Agri-environment Schemes; Plant diversity; Soil nutrients; Weed management; Wildflower strips.
Similar articles
-
Biodiversity and agro-ecology in field margins.Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci. 2005;70(1):17-49. Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci. 2005. PMID: 16363358
-
Impact of prescribed burning, mowing and abandonment on a Mediterranean grassland: A 5-year multi-kingdom comparison.Sci Total Environ. 2022 Aug 15;834:155442. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.155442. Epub 2022 Apr 22. Sci Total Environ. 2022. PMID: 35469869
-
Morphological and physiological traits of dominant plant species in response to mowing in a temperate steppe.Ecol Appl. 2023 Jul;33(5):e2863. doi: 10.1002/eap.2863. Epub 2023 May 25. Ecol Appl. 2023. PMID: 37185997
-
Effects of mowing regimes on above- and belowground biota in semi-arid grassland of northern China.J Environ Manage. 2021 Jan 1;277:111441. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111441. Epub 2020 Oct 6. J Environ Manage. 2021. PMID: 33035940
-
Liming impacts on soils, crops and biodiversity in the UK: A review.Sci Total Environ. 2018 Jan 1;610-611:316-332. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.08.020. Epub 2017 Aug 11. Sci Total Environ. 2018. PMID: 28806549 Review.
Cited by
-
Spatial-temporal variability in under-canopy soil fertility and nutritional contents of cashew trees in Makonde Plateau of southeastern Tanzania.Heliyon. 2023 Nov 14;9(11):e22321. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e22321. eCollection 2023 Nov. Heliyon. 2023. PMID: 38053893 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources

