Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 Mar 12;11(3):117.
doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics11030117.

Effects of Silicon Compounds on Biomineralization, Osteogenesis, and Hard Tissue Formation

Affiliations
Free PMC article
Review

Effects of Silicon Compounds on Biomineralization, Osteogenesis, and Hard Tissue Formation

Werner Götz et al. Pharmaceutics. .
Free PMC article

Abstract

Bioinspired stem cell-based hard tissue engineering includes numerous aspects: The synthesis and fabrication of appropriate scaffold materials, their analytical characterization, and guided osteogenesis using the sustained release of osteoinducing and/or osteoconducting drugs for mesenchymal stem cell differentiation, growth, and proliferation. Here, the effect of silicon- and silicate-containing materials on osteogenesis at the molecular level has been a particular focus within the last decade. This review summarizes recently published scientific results, including material developments and analysis, with a special focus on silicon hybrid bone composites. First, the sources, bioavailability, and functions of silicon on various tissues are discussed. The second focus is on the effects of calcium-silicate biomineralization and corresponding analytical methods in investigating osteogenesis and bone formation. Finally, recent developments in the manufacturing of Si-containing scaffolds are discussed, including in vitro and in vivo studies, as well as recently filed patents that focus on the influence of silicon on hard tissue formation.

Keywords: alveolar bone; biomineralization; osteoblast; osteogenesis; scaffold; silicates; silicon; stem cells; tissue engineering.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Setup of wide-angle X-ray scattering (WAXS) and small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS).
Figure 2
Figure 2
SAXS setup: Transmission (T)-SAXS and gracing incidence (GI)-SAXS measurement setup.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Characterization of materials. (a) XRD analysis showing that both Si-free and Si-doped HA groups exhibited the main diffraction peaks of HA in comparison to the HA standard card (JCPDS-PDF 09-0432). (b) FTIR analysis indicating that each group of template-induced materials displayed the typical phosphate group and main functional groups of amides I and II due to the presence of organic protein templates. (c) Thermogravimetric (TGA) analysis confirming that the template-induced materials were organic–inorganic composites consisting of 20%–30% organics and 70%–80% inorganics. (d) Si-molybdenum blue spectrophotometry confirming that the actual value of silicon content was quite close to the theory value. (e,f) X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) analysis showing the typical peaks of Ca and P in a Si–O group and the typical peaks of Si in Si-doped groups. The mole ratio of n(Ca)/n(P) or n(Ca)/[n(P) + n(Si)] of the sample was close to the theoretical value of HA (n(Ca)/n(P) = 1.67). Reprinted from [140], with permission from Springer Nature, 2017.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Five percent calcium silicate (CS)/β-TCP scaffolds stimulated human bone marrow stromal cell (hBMSC) osteogenesis and human umbilical cord vein endothelial cell (HUVEC) angiogenesis in vitro. (A) Alkaline phosphatase (ALP) staining in hBMSCs cultured for 7 and 14 days with β-TCP scaffolds or 5% CS/β-TCP scaffolds in transwell inserts. (B) 5% CS/β-TCP scaffolds stimulated ALP activity at 7 days and 14 days in comparison to pure β-TCP. (C) Schematic representation of transwell experiments. Scaffolds in transwell inserts (upper chamber), cells in the lower chamber. (D) Tube formation by HUVECs, as observed by light microscopy (top) and calcein acetoxymethyl (AM) staining (bottom), after 4 h on Matrigel with β-TCP or 5% CS/β-TCP scaffolds in transwell inserts; (E) 5% CS/β-TCP scaffolds enhanced tube formation in comparison to β-TCP scaffolds. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01. Scale bar represents 10 μm. Reprinted from [161], published under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, 2017.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Jugdaohsingh R. Silicone and bone health. J. Nutr. Health Aging. 2007;11:99–110. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pietak A.M., Reid J.W., Scott M.J., Sayer M. Silicon substitution in the calcium phosphate bioceramics. Biomaterials. 2007;28:4023–4032. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.05.003. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wang S., Wang X., Draenert F.G., Albert O., Schröder H.C., Mailänder V., Mitov G., Müller W.E.G. Bioactive and biodegradable silica biomaterial for bone regeneration. Bone. 2017;67:292–304. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2014.07.025. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hing K.A., Revell P.A., Smith N., Buckland T. Effect of silicon level on rate, quality and progression of bone healing within silicate substituted porous hydroxyapatite scaffolds. Biomaterials. 2006;27:5014–5026. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.05.039. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mieszawska A.J., Fourligas N., Georgakoudi I., Ouhib N.M., Belton D.J., Perry C.C., Kaplan D.L. Osteoinductive silk-silica composite biomaterials for bone regeneration. Biomaterials. 2010;31:8902–8910. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.07.109. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources