Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
, 8, 49
eCollection

Facility Type and Surgical Specialty Are Associated With Suboptimal Surgical Antimicrobial Prophylaxis Practice Patterns: A Multi-Center, Retrospective Cohort Study

Affiliations

Facility Type and Surgical Specialty Are Associated With Suboptimal Surgical Antimicrobial Prophylaxis Practice Patterns: A Multi-Center, Retrospective Cohort Study

Westyn Branch-Elliman et al. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control.

Abstract

Background: Guidelines recommend discontinuation of antimicrobial prophylaxis within 24 h after incision closure in uninfected patients. However, how facility and surgical specialty factors affect the implementation of these evidence-based surgical prophylaxis guidelines in outpatient surgery is unknown. Thus, we sought to measure how facility complexity, including ambulatory surgical center (ASC) status and availability of ancillary services, impact adherence to guidelines for timely discontinuation of antimicrobial prophylaxis after outpatient surgery. A secondary aim was to measure the association between surgical specialty and guideline compliance.

Methods: A multi-center, national Veterans Health Administration retrospective cohort from 10/1/2015-9/30/2017 including any Veteran undergoing an outpatient surgical procedure in any of five specialties (general surgery, urology, ophthalmology, ENT, orthopedics) was created. The primary outcome was the association between facility complexity and proportion of surgeries not compliant with discontinuation of antimicrobials within 24 h of incision closure. Data were analyzed using logistic regression with adjustments for patient and procedural factors.

Results: Among 153,097 outpatient surgeries, 7712 (5.0%) received antimicrobial prophylaxis lasting > 24 h after surgery; rates ranged from 0.4% (eye surgeries) to 13.7% (genitourinary surgeries). Cystoscopies and cystoureteroscopy with lithotripsy procedures had the highest rates (16 and 20%), while hernia repair, cataract surgeries, and laparoscopic cholecystectomies had the lowest (0.2-0.3%). In an adjusted logistic regression model, lower complexity ASC and hospital outpatient departments had higher odds of prolonged antimicrobial prophylaxis compared to complex hospitals (OR ASC, 1.3, 95% CI: 1.2-1.5). Patient factors associated with higher odds of noncompliance with antimicrobial discontinuation included younger age, female sex, and white race. Genitourinary and ear/nose/throat surgeries were associated with the highest odds of prolonged antimicrobial prophylaxis.

Conclusions: Facility complexity appears to play a role in adherence to surgical infection prevention guidelines. Lower complexity facilities with limited infection prevention and antimicrobial stewardship resources may be important targets for quality improvement. Such interventions may be especially useful for genitourinary and ear/nose/throat surgical subspecialties. Increasing pharmacy, antimicrobial stewardship and/or infection prevention resources to promote more evidence-based care may support surgical providers in lower complexity ambulatory surgery centers and hospital outpatient departments in their efforts to improve this facet of patient safety.

Keywords: Ambulatory surgery; Antimicrobial stewardship; Prophylaxis; Quality improvement; Surgical quality.

Conflict of interest statement

This study was approved by the VA Boston IRB prior to data collection and analysis. Given the retrospective nature of the work, waiver of consent was obtained.Not applicable.KI Received an investigator-initiated award from Pfizer to study the epidemiology of Staphylococcus aureus surgical site infections. All other authors have no conflicts to report.Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Identification of Study Sample from FY16–17 Outpatient Encounters in VA Facilities with Surgical Services

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. Bratzler DW, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for antimicrobial prophylaxis in surgery. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2013;70(3):195–283. doi: 10.2146/ajhp120568. - DOI - PubMed
    1. McDonald M, et al. Single- versus multiple-dose antimicrobial prophylaxis for major surgery: a systematic review. Aust N Z J Surg. 1998;68(6):388–396. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.1998.tb04785.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Branch-Elliman, W., et al. Unintended consequences of double versus single antimicrobial prophylaxis in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. in Open Forum Infectious Diseases 2016. Oxford University Press.
    1. Safavi KC, et al. Variation in surgical quality measure adherence within hospital referral regions: do publicly reported surgical quality measures distinguish among hospitals that patients are likely to compare? Health Serv Res. 2014;49(4):1108–1120. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12164. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Commission, T.J. Specifications Manual for Joint Commission National Quality Core Measures (2010A1): Measure Information Form SCIP-Inf-3. 2010 2010 [cited 2018 August 3]; Available from: https://manual.jointcommission.org/releases/archive/TJC2010B/MIF0112.html.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources

Feedback