Results of a feasibility randomised clinical trial on pain education for low back pain in Nepal: the Pain Education in Nepal-Low Back Pain (PEN-LBP) feasibility trial

BMJ Open. 2019 Mar 27;9(3):e026874. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026874.

Abstract

Objectives: The aims of this study were to: (1) develop pain education materials in Nepali and (2) determine the feasibility of conducting a randomised clinical trial (RCT) of a pain education intervention using these materials in Nepal.

Design: A two-arm, parallel, assessor-blinded, feasibility RCT.

Setting: A rehabilitation hospital in Kathmandu, Nepal.

Participants: Forty Nepalese with non-specific low back pain (mean [SD] age 41 [14] years; 12 [30%] women).

Interventions: Eligible participants were randomised, by concealed, 1:1 allocation, to one of two groups: (1) a pain education intervention and (2) a guideline-based physiotherapy active control group intervention. Each intervention was delivered by a physiotherapist in a single, 1-hour, individualised treatment session.

Primary outcome measures: The primary outcomes were related to feasibility: recruitment, retention and treatment adherence of participants, feasibility and blinding of outcome assessments, fidelity of treatment delivery, credibility of, and satisfaction with, treatment. Assessments were performed at baseline and at 1 week post-treatment.

Secondary outcome measures: Pain intensity, pain interference, pain catastrophising, sleep disturbance, resilience, global rating of change, depression and quality of life. Statistical analyses were conducted blind to group allocation.

Results: Forty participants were recruited. Thirty-eight participants (95%) completed the 1-week post-treatment assessment. Most primary outcomes surpassed the a priori thresholds for feasibility. Several findings have important implications for designing a full trial. Secondary analyses suggest clinical benefit of pain education over the control intervention, with larger decrease in pain intensity (mean difference=3.56 [95% CI 0.21 to 6.91]) and pain catastrophising (mean difference=6.16 [95% CI 0.59 to 11.72]) in the pain education group. Pain intensity would seem an appropriate outcome for a full clinical trial. One minor adverse event was reported.

Conclusion: We conclude that a full RCT of pain education for back pain in Nepal is feasible and warranted.

Trial registration number: NCT03387228; Results.

Keywords: culture; low back pain; low-income country; musculoskeletal pain; pain management; patient education.

Publication types

  • Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Feasibility Studies
  • Humans
  • Low Back Pain / psychology
  • Low Back Pain / rehabilitation*
  • Low Back Pain / therapy
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Nepal / epidemiology
  • Patient Compliance / psychology
  • Patient Compliance / statistics & numerical data*
  • Patient Education as Topic
  • Patient Outcome Assessment
  • Physical Therapy Modalities*

Associated data

  • ClinicalTrials.gov/NCT03387228