Do facial first impressions reflect a shared social reality?
- PMID: 30924928
- DOI: 10.1111/bjop.12390
Do facial first impressions reflect a shared social reality?
Abstract
Influential facial impression models have repeatedly shown that trustworthiness, youthful-attractiveness, and dominance dimensions subserve a wide variety of first impressions formed from strangers' faces, suggestive of a shared social reality. However, these models are built from impressions aggregated across observers. Critically, recent work has now shown substantial inter-observer differences in facial impressions, raising the important question of whether these dimensional models based on aggregated group data are meaningful at the individual observer level. We addressed this question with a novel case series approach, using factor analyses of ratings of twelve different traits to build individual models of facial impressions for different observers. Strikingly, three dimensions of trustworthiness, youthful/attractiveness, and competence/dominance appeared across the majority of these individual observer models, demonstrating that the dimensional approach is indeed meaningful at the individual level. Nonetheless, we also found differences in the stability of the competence/dominance dimension across observers. Taken together, results suggest that individual differences in impressions arise in the context of a largely common structure that supports a shared social reality.
Keywords: face perception; first impressions; individual differences.
© 2019 The British Psychological Society.
Similar articles
-
Integrating social and facial models of person perception: Converging and diverging dimensions.Cognition. 2016 Dec;157:257-267. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2016.09.006. Epub 2016 Sep 28. Cognition. 2016. PMID: 27689511
-
Individual differences in trust evaluations are shaped mostly by environments, not genes.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 May 12;117(19):10218-10224. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1920131117. Epub 2020 Apr 27. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020. PMID: 32341163 Free PMC article.
-
Three's a crowd: Fast ensemble perception of first impressions of trustworthiness.Cognition. 2023 Oct;239:105540. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2023.105540. Epub 2023 Jul 19. Cognition. 2023. PMID: 37478696
-
The cultural learning account of first impressions.Trends Cogn Sci. 2022 Aug;26(8):656-668. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2022.05.007. Epub 2022 Jun 10. Trends Cogn Sci. 2022. PMID: 35697651 Review.
-
Where do spontaneous first impressions of faces come from?Cognition. 2018 Jan;170:190-200. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.10.002. Epub 2017 Oct 11. Cognition. 2018. PMID: 29028612 Review.
Cited by
-
Virtual first impressions: Zoom backgrounds affect judgements of trust and competence.PLoS One. 2023 Sep 27;18(9):e0291444. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0291444. eCollection 2023. PLoS One. 2023. PMID: 37756284 Free PMC article.
-
Understanding trait impressions from faces.Br J Psychol. 2022 Nov;113(4):1056-1078. doi: 10.1111/bjop.12583. Epub 2022 Jul 26. Br J Psychol. 2022. PMID: 35880691 Free PMC article.
-
Can I Trust This Person? Evaluations of Trustworthiness From Faces and Relevant Individual Variables.Front Psychol. 2022 May 10;13:857511. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.857511. eCollection 2022. Front Psychol. 2022. PMID: 35619794 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Tracking sexual dimorphism of facial width-to-height ratio across the lifespan: implications for perceived aggressiveness.R Soc Open Sci. 2022 May 4;9(5):211500. doi: 10.1098/rsos.211500. eCollection 2022 May. R Soc Open Sci. 2022. PMID: 35592758 Free PMC article.
-
Judgements of Social Dominance From Faces and Related Variables.Front Psychol. 2022 Apr 29;13:873147. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.873147. eCollection 2022. Front Psychol. 2022. PMID: 35578657 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- Abele, A. E., & Bruckmüller, S. (2011). The bigger one of the “Big Two”? Preferential processing of communal information Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 935-948. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2011.03.028
-
- Allport, G. W., & Odbert, H. S. (1936). Trait-names: A psycho-lexical study. Psychological Monographs, 47(1), 1-171. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0093360
-
- Bonnefon, J.-F., Hopfensitz, A., & De Neys, W. (2015). Face-ism and kernels of truth in facial inferences. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 19, 421-422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2015.05.002
-
- Cortina, J. M. (1993). What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(1), 98-104. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.78.1.98
-
- Cuddy, A. J. C., Fiske, S. T., & Glick, P. (2008). Warmth and competence as universal dimensions of social perception: The stereotype content model and the BIAS map. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 61-149. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(07)00002-0
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
