Objectives: In patients with traumatic pelvic fracture urethral injuries (PFUI), the interaction between urethral management and orthopaedic decision making remains unknown. We aimed to survey orthopaedic and urologic surgeons to assess interdisciplinary interactions in the management of PFUI.
Methods: An anonymous cross-sectional survey of members of the Orthopaedic Trauma Association (OTA) and the Society of Genitourinary Reconstructive Surgeons (GURS) was conducted between September 2017 and August 2018. Participants were queried regarding the impact of urethral injuries and their management on orthopaedic operative decision making.
Results: Fifty-three GURS and 64 OTA members responded (17% response rate). For urethral injury management, 73% of OTA respondents preferred that suprapubic tubes (SPTs) were not placed for urethral injury management, whereas 43% of GURS respondents preferred SPTs (P = 0.08). Ninety-two percent of OTA respondents stated that SPTs increase hardware infection risks in patients undergoing pelvic open reduction with internal fixation (ORIF), whereas only 8% of GURS respondents agreed (P < 0.01). Although 66% of GURS respondents reported not considering the operative plans of orthopaedics when determining urethral management, 75% of OTA respondents reported that they were less inclined to proceed with ORIF, and 70% would perform external fixation in the setting of an SPT, despite 78% believing that this resulted in an inferior outcome for the patient.
Conclusions: There is discordance between urologists and orthopaedists as to the optimal management of PFUI patients, with significant disagreement regarding the infectious risks of SPT in the setting of ORIF. Improved data and interdisciplinary dialogue are required to maximize patient outcomes.
Level of evidence: Therapeutic Level V. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Risk of infectious complications in pelvic fracture urethral injury patients managed with internal fixation and suprapubic catheter placement.J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2018 Sep;85(3):536-540. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000002012. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2018. PMID: 29985241
Current Practice in the Management of Open Fractures Among Orthopaedic Trauma Surgeons. Part A: Initial Management. A Survey of Orthopaedic Trauma Surgeons.J Orthop Trauma. 2014 Aug;28(8):e198-202. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000033. J Orthop Trauma. 2014. PMID: 26057885
Management of pelvic fracture-associated urethral injuries: A survey of Canadian urologists.Can Urol Assoc J. 2017 Mar-Apr;11(3-4):E74-E78. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.4154. Epub 2017 Mar 16. Can Urol Assoc J. 2017. PMID: 28360950 Free PMC article.
Current management of pelvic fracture urethral injuries: to realign or not?Transl Androl Urol. 2018 Aug;7(4):593-602. doi: 10.21037/tau.2018.01.14. Transl Androl Urol. 2018. PMID: 30211049 Free PMC article. Review.
Pelvic-fracture urethral injury in children.Arab J Urol. 2015 Mar;13(1):37-42. doi: 10.1016/j.aju.2014.11.007. Epub 2015 Feb 14. Arab J Urol. 2015. PMID: 26019977 Free PMC article. Review.