Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 May 24;294(21):8395-8402.
doi: 10.1074/jbc.RA119.008154. Epub 2019 Apr 2.

Common motifs in ETAA1 and TOPBP1 required for ATR kinase activation

Affiliations

Common motifs in ETAA1 and TOPBP1 required for ATR kinase activation

Vaughn Thada et al. J Biol Chem. .

Abstract

DNA damage response Ser/Thr kinases, including ataxia telangiectasia-mutated (ATM) and Rad3-related (ATR), control cell cycle progression, DNA repair, and apoptosis. ATR is activated by ETAA1 activator of ATR kinase (ETAA1) or DNA topoisomerase II binding protein 1 (TOPBP1). Both ETAA1 and TOPBP1 contain experimentally defined ATR activation domains (AADs) that are mostly unstructured and have minimal sequence similarity. A tryptophan residue in both AADs is required for ATR activation, but the other features of these domains and the mechanism by which they activate ATR are unknown. In this study, using bioinformatic analyses, kinase assays, co-immunoprecipitation, and immunofluorescence measures of signaling, we more specifically defined the TOPBP1 and ETAA1 AADs and identified additional features of the AADs needed for ATR activation. We found that both ETAA1 and TOPBP1 contain a predicted coiled-coil motif that is required for ATR activation in vitro and in cells. Mutation of the predicted coiled coils does not alter AAD oligomerization but does impair binding of the AADs to ATR. These results suggest that TOPBP1 and ETAA1 activate ATR using similar motifs and mechanisms.

Keywords: ATR; ATR activation domain (AAD); DNA damage response; DNA replication; DNA topoisomerase II binding protein 1 (TOPBP1); ETAA1 activator of ATR kinase (ETAA1); PI3K-related protein kinase (PIKK); cancer; cell cycle; serine/threonine protein kinase; signaling.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest with the contents of this article. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Identification of the ETAA1 ATR activation domain. A, schematic of ETAA1 with the AAD and RPA interaction motifs indicated. ETAA1 predicted disorder was calculated using IUPred2A (31). The AAD region is indicated by the red box. B, schematic of the ETAA1 AAD, with the critical tryptophan (W) and predicted coiled coil (CC) indicated. Predicted coiled coil per residue scores were calculated using Paircoil2 (29). C–F, Purified ATR–ATRIP complexes were incubated with GST or the indicated GST-ETAA1 AADs, an ATR substrate, and [γ-32P]ATP. Reaction products were separated by SDS-PAGE and detected by Coomassie staining and immunoblotting. Substrate phosphorylation was detected by autoradiography. MW, molecular weight. G, quantification of three experiments as shown in F. Statistical significance was calculated using a one-way analysis of variance and Tukey's multiple comparisons test. Error bars are mean ± S.D.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Identification of the TOPBP1 ATR activation domain. A, schematic of TOPBP1 with the AAD indicated. BRCT domains are shown as dark blue boxes. TOPBP1 predicted disorder was calculated using IUPred2A (31). The AAD region is indicated by the red box. B, schematic of the TOPBP1 AAD, with the critical tryptophan (W) and predicted coiled coil (CC) indicated. Predicted coiled coil per residue scores were calculated using Paircoil2 (29). C and D, purified ATR–ATRIP complexes were incubated with GST or the indicated GST-TOPBP1 AADs, an ATR substrate, and [γ-32P]ATP. Reaction products were separated by SDS-PAGE and detected by Coomassie staining and immunoblotting. Substrate phosphorylation was detected by autoradiography. MW, molecular weight.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Mutation of a conserved phenylalanine disrupts ETAA1- and TOPBP1-dependent ATR activation. A, sequence alignment of ETAA1 and TOPBP1 predicted coiled coil residues flanking ETAA1 Phe-198 and TOPBP1 Phe-1071. B and C, purified ATR–ATRIP complexes were incubated with GST or the indicated GST-ETAA1 or GST-TOPBP1 AADs, an ATR substrate, and [γ-32P]ATP. Reaction products were separated by SDS-PAGE and detected by Coomassie staining. Substrate phosphorylation was detected by autoradiography. D–I, empty vector or the indicated ETAA1 or TOPBP1 AAD proteins were expressed in U2OS cells. γH2AX (D, E, G, and H) or MCM2 pSer-108 (F and I) was visualized in FLAG-positive nuclei. Scale bars = 10 μm. A.U., arbitrary units. γH2AX and MCM2 pSer-108 intensity is normalized to the FLAG expression level. Statistical significance was calculated using a one-way analysis of variance and Tukey's multiple comparisons test. Error bars are mean ± S.D.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Mutation of the AADs does not alter AAD oligomerization. A and B, the indicated ETAA1 (A) or TOPBP1 (B) AADs were eluted from a SuperdexTM 200 Increase 10/300 GL column while measuring UV absorbance at 280 nm. Equal amounts of fractions corresponding to peaks were separated by SDS-PAGE and visualized by Coomassie staining. The elution volume of molecular mass standards is indicated. MW, molecular weight.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
The predicted coiled coils promote the ETAA1 and TOPBP1 AAD–ATR interaction. A and B, empty vector or the indicated ETAA1 (A) or TOPBP1 (B) AADs were immunoprecipitated (IP) from HEK293T cell nuclear extracts. Immunoprecipitated proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE and detected by immunoblotting. MW, molecular weight. C and D, purified GST or recombinant GST-ETAA1 (C) or GST-TOPBP1 (D) proteins bound to GSH beads were incubated with HEK293T cell nuclear extracts expressing FLAG-ATR and HA-ATRIP. Bound proteins were eluted, separated by SDS-PAGE, and detected by Coomassie staining (CB) or immunoblotting.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ciccia A., and Elledge S. J. (2010) The DNA damage response: making it safe to play with knives. Mol. Cell 40, 179–204 10.1016/j.molcel.2010.09.019 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zeman M. K., and Cimprich K. A. (2014) Causes and consequences of replication stress. Nat. Cell Biol. 16, 2–9 10.1038/ncb2897 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Blackford A. N., and Jackson S. P. (2017) ATM, ATR, and DNA-PK: the trinity at the heart of the DNA damage response. Mol. Cell 66, 801–817 10.1016/j.molcel.2017.05.015 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Saldivar J. C., Cortez D., and Cimprich K. A. (2017) The essential kinase ATR: ensuring faithful duplication of a challenging genome. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 18, 622–636 10.1038/nrm.2017.67 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cortez D., Guntuku S., Qin J., and Elledge S. J. (2001) ATR and ATRIP: partners in checkpoint signaling. Science 294, 1713–1716 10.1126/science.1065521 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms