Development of polymorphic EST-SSR markers and characterization of the autotetraploid genome of sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia)

PeerJ. 2019 Mar 26:7:e6542. doi: 10.7717/peerj.6542. eCollection 2019.

Abstract

Background: Sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia) is a highly nutritious, tannin-containing, and tetraploid forage legume. Due to the lack of detailed transcriptomic and genomic information on this species, genetic and breeding projects for sainfoin improvement have been significantly hindered.

Methods: In this study, a total of 24,630,711 clean reads were generated from 14 different sainfoin tissues using Illumina paired-end sequencing technology and deposited in the NCBI SRA database (SRX3763386). From these clean reads, 77,764 unigene sequences were obtained and 6,752 EST-SSRs were identified using de novo assembly. A total of 2,469 primer pairs were designed, and 200 primer pairs were randomly selected to analyze the polymorphism in five sainfoin wild accessions.

Results: Further analysis of 40 sainfoin individuals from the five wild populations using 61 EST-SSR loci showed that the number of alleles per locus ranged from 4 to 15, and the expected heterozygosity varied from 0.55 to 0.91. Additionally, by counting the EST-SSR band number and sequencing the three or four bands in one sainfoin individual, sainfoin was confirmed to be autotetraploid. This finding provides a high level of information about this plant.

Discussion: Through this study, 61 EST-SSR markers were successfully developed and shown to be useful for genetic studies and investigations of population genetic structures and variabilities among different sainfoin accessions.

Keywords: Autotetraploidy; EST-SSR; Genetic diversity; Onobrychis viciifolia; Polymorphism.

Grants and funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China, Grant/Award Numbers: 31722055, 31672476, and 31730093; Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, Grant/Award Numbers: lzujbky-2017-ot22 and lzujbky-2017-it08. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.