Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Feb 14;70(5):798-804.
doi: 10.1093/cid/ciz292.

Rationale for a Neisseria gonorrhoeae Susceptible-only Interpretive Breakpoint for Azithromycin

Affiliations

Rationale for a Neisseria gonorrhoeae Susceptible-only Interpretive Breakpoint for Azithromycin

Ellen N Kersh et al. Clin Infect Dis. .

Abstract

Background: Azithromycin (AZI) is recommended with ceftriaxone (CRO) for treatment of uncomplicated gonococcal urethritis and cervicitis in the United States, and an AZI-susceptibility breakpoint is needed. Neither the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) nor the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) has set interpretive breakpoints for AZI susceptibility. As a result, AZI antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) cannot be interpreted using recognized standards. This has contributed to increasingly unavailable clinical laboratory AST, although gonorrhea is on the rise with >550 000 US gonorrhea cases reported to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in 2017, the highest number of cases since 1991.

Methods: This article summarizes the rationale data reviewed by the CLSI in June 2018.

Results: The CLSI decided to set a susceptible-only interpretive breakpoint at the minimum inhibitory concentration of ≤1 µg/mL. This is also the epidemiological cutoff value (ECV) (ie, the end of the wild-type susceptibility distribution). This breakpoint presumes that AZI (1-g single dose) is used in an approved regimen that includes an additional antimicrobial agent (ie, CRO 250 mg, intramuscular single dose).

Conclusions: Having a breakpoint can improve patient care and surveillance and allow future development and FDA regulatory approval of modernized AST to guide treatment. The breakpoint coincides with a European Committee on AST decision to remove previously established, differing AZI breakpoints and use the ECV as guidance for testing. The CLSI breakpoint is now the recognized standard that defines AZI susceptibility for gonococcal infections.

Keywords: Neisseria gonorrhoeae; antimicrobial resistance; breakpoints; interpretive criteria.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
A: AZI susceptibilities of 15,496 GISP GC isolates from the US national surveillance project GISP 2014 – 2016, as determined by the agar dilution method. The dotted line represents previous and current ECV determinations. The x-axis reflects the range of dilutions in the current GISP protocol. B: AZI susceptibilities of GISP GC isolates from 1992 – 2004 (dark grey), 2005 – 2012 (black), and 1992 – 2012 (light grey), as determined by agar dilution and previously reviewed by CLSI. The circle at 0.5 and 1 μg/ml highlights isolates at the CLSI breakpoint before and after 2005 when a media change took place. The shift in MICs by one dilution was likely due to a change in commercial media formulation. It occurred in all participating reference laboratories for AZI only in 2005. This prompted the CDC to change its alert criteria upwards by one dilution as a single event in 2006. Except for this occurrence, no substantial shift in the modal MIC has occurred in GISP.
Fig 2:
Fig 2:
GC genetic marker association with AZI MICs. A previously sequenced convenience sample of 732 GISP isolates from 2013 – 2015 underwent genetic marker analysis at CDC. Analyses of the 23S rRNA C2611T (A) and A2059G (B) mutations are shown. The wild-type base at position 2611 is C, and is A at position 2059. The circle at ≥16 μg/ml highlights the three isolates with the A2059G mutation.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Workowski KA, Bolan GA, Centers for Disease C, Prevention. 2015. Sexually transmitted diseases treatment guidelines, 2015. MMWR Recomm Rep 64:1–137. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Centers for Disease C, Prevention. 2007. Update to CDC’s sexually transmitted diseases treatment guidelines, 2006: fluoroquinolones no longer recommended for treatment of gonococcal infections. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 56:332–6. - PubMed
    1. Centers for Disease C, Prevention. 2012. Update to CDC’s Sexually transmitted diseases treatment guidelines, 2010: oral cephalosporins no longer a recommended treatment for gonococcal infections. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 61:590–4. - PubMed
    1. CDC. 2018. Sexually Transmitted Disease Surveillance 2017. https://www.cdc.gov/std/stats17/default.htm. Accessed Sept 26, 2018.
    1. Weston EJ, Workowski K, Torrone E, Weinstock H, Stenger MR. 2018. Adherence to CDC Recommendations for the Treatment of Uncomplicated Gonorrhea - STD Surveillance Network, United States, 2016. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 67:473–476. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types