Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2019 Oct;70(4):1377-1391.
doi: 10.1002/hep.30651. Epub 2019 May 28.

A Bioreactor Technology for Modeling Fibrosis in Human and Rodent Precision-Cut Liver Slices

Affiliations
Comparative Study

A Bioreactor Technology for Modeling Fibrosis in Human and Rodent Precision-Cut Liver Slices

Hannah L Paish et al. Hepatology. 2019 Oct.

Abstract

Precision cut liver slices (PCLSs) retain the structure and cellular composition of the native liver and represent an improved system to study liver fibrosis compared to two-dimensional mono- or co-cultures. The aim of this study was to develop a bioreactor system to increase the healthy life span of PCLSs and model fibrogenesis. PCLSs were generated from normal rat or human liver, or fibrotic rat liver, and cultured in our bioreactor. PCLS function was quantified by albumin enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Fibrosis was induced in PCLSs by transforming growth factor beta 1 (TGFβ1) and platelet-derived growth factor (PDGFββ) stimulation ± therapy. Fibrosis was assessed by gene expression, picrosirius red, and α-smooth muscle actin staining, hydroxyproline assay, and soluble ELISAs. Bioreactor-cultured PCLSs are viable, maintaining tissue structure, metabolic activity, and stable albumin secretion for up to 6 days under normoxic culture conditions. Conversely, standard static transwell-cultured PCLSs rapidly deteriorate, and albumin secretion is significantly impaired by 48 hours. TGFβ1/PDGFββ stimulation of rat or human PCLSs induced fibrogenic gene expression, release of extracellular matrix proteins, activation of hepatic myofibroblasts, and histological fibrosis. Fibrogenesis slowly progresses over 6 days in cultured fibrotic rat PCLSs without exogenous challenge. Activin receptor-like kinase 5 (Alk5) inhibitor (Alk5i), nintedanib, and obeticholic acid therapy limited fibrogenesis in TGFβ1/PDGFββ-stimulated PCLSs, and Alk5i blunted progression of fibrosis in fibrotic PCLS. Conclusion: We describe a bioreactor technology that maintains functional PCLS cultures for 6 days. Bioreactor-cultured PCLSs can be successfully used to model fibrogenesis and demonstrate efficacy of antifibrotic therapies.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Generation of PCLSs and optimization of the bioreactor culture method. (A) Workflow used to generate PCLSs. (B) Photographs show the BioR plate containing six bioreactor chamber units and a zoomed image of one chamber unit, which contains two wells connected by a channel. (C) Photograph of PCLSs cultured on 8‐μm Transwell inserts in the BioR plate. (D,E) Graphs show secreted albumin (ng/mL) levels in media of PCLSs cultured on 3‐ or 8‐μm Transwell inserts in either a rocking BioR plate (D) or static 12‐well Transwell plate (E).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Modeling fibrosis and testing antifibrotic therapy in normal rat liver slices. (A) Graph shows soluble Col1a1 (ng/mL) levels in media of bioreactor‐cultured rPCLSs after 24‐hour rest and then 24‐ and 72‐hour culture ± fib stim (TGFβ1/PDGFββ) ± Alk5i (48‐ and 96‐hour total culture). (B‐D) mRNA levels of Col1A1, αSMA, and TIMP1 in rPCLSs at t = 0 and after 24‐hour rest + 72‐hour culture ± fib stim ± Alk5i (96‐hour total culture). (A‐D) Numbers on bars show fold change compared to t = 0. (E) Representative 100× magnification images of αSMA and picrosirius red–stained rPCLSs from three different livers at t = 0 and after 24‐hour rest + 72‐hour culture ± fib stim ± Alk5i. Scale bars = 200 µm. (F) Graph shows percentage area of picrosirius red–stained tissue in rPCLS at t = 0 and after 24‐hour rest + 72‐hour culture ± fib stim ± Alk5i. Data are mean ± SEM in n = 4 different livers. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001; ***P < 0.0001. Abbreviations: Cont, control; fib stim, fibrotic stimulation; IHC, immunohistochemistry; Veh, vehicle.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Bioreactor‐cultured fibrotic rat liver slices can be maintained for 6 days. (A) Graph shows hydroxyproline (μg/g of liver tissue) in bioreactor‐cultured fPCLSs. (B‐D) mRNA expression of Col1A1, αSMA, and TIMP1 in bioreactor‐cultured fPCLSs at t = 0 and 2‐, 3‐, 4‐, and 6‐day culture. Data are mean ± SEM in n = 5 independent slice experiments. (E) Representative images of αSMA and picrosirius red–stained rat fPCLS at t = 0 and 2, 3, 4, and 6 days in culture. Scale bars = 200 µm. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01. Abbreviation: IHC, immunohistochemistry.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Bioreactor‐cultured human liver slices retain ductular cells, endothelial cells, and macrophages. Representative images show CK19‐stained biliary epithelial cells (left), CD31‐stained endothelial cells (middle), and CD68‐stained macrophages (right) in t = 0 and days 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6 cultured hPCLS. CK19 and CD31 images are at 400× magnification and CD68 are at 200× magnification.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Modeling fibrosis and testing antifibrotic therapy in human liver slices using soluble markers. (A‐H) Graphs show fibronectin (μg/mL), HA (ng/mL), TIMP1 (ng/mL), MMP1 (ng/mL), MMP7 (ng/mL), MMP10 (ng/mL), IL‐6 (pg/mL), IL‐1β (pg/mL), and VEGF (pg/mL) levels in media of bioreactor‐cultured hPCLSs after 24‐hour rest and then 24‐ or 72‐hour culture ± fib stim (TGFβ1/PDGFββ) ± Alk5i; numbers on bars show fold change compared to 48‐hour control. Data are mean ± SEM in n = 4 independent slice experiments. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001; ****P < 0.0001. Abbreviations: Cont, control; fib stim, fibrotic stimulation; Veh, vehicle.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Modeling fibrosis and testing antifibrotic therapy in human liver slices using gene expression and histology. (A) mRNA levels of Col1A1, αSMA, and TIMP1 in hPCLS at t = 0 and after 24‐hour rest + 72‐hour culture ± fib stim ± Alk5i; numbers on bars show fold change compared to t = 0. (B) Representative 100× magnification images of αSMA and (C) picrosirius red–stained hPCLSs from three different donor livers at t = 0 and after 24‐h rest + 72‐hour culture (4 days) ± fib stim ± Alk5i. Scale bars = 200 µm. (D) Representative 200× magnification image of picrosirius red–stained hPCLSs from donor 4. (E) Percentage area of picrosirius red–stained tissue in hPCLSs at t = 0 and after 24‐hour rest + 72‐hour culture ± fib stim ± Alk5i (96‐hour total culture). Data are mean ± SEM in n = 4 independent slice experiments. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001; ****P < 0.0001. Abbreviations: Cont, control; fib stim, fibrotic stimulation; IHC, immunohistochemistry; Veh, vehicle.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Assessing impact antifibrotic therapies in fibrosis‐induced rat liver slices. (A‐C) mRNA levels of Col1A1, αSMA, and TIMP1 in rPCLS at t = 0 and after 24‐hour rest + 72‐hour culture ± fib stim ± nintedanib, OCA, and losartan (96‐hour total culture). Data are mean ± SEM in n = 5 different livers. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001; ***P < 0.0001. (D) Average media albumin (ng/mL) levels in bioreactor‐cultured rPCLSs after 24‐hour rest and then 24‐ to 72‐hour culture ± fib stim (TGFβ1/PDGFββ) ± Alk5i, nintedanib, OCA, and losartan (48‐ and 96‐hour total culture). Abbreviations: Cont, control; fib stim, fibrotic stimulation; Nint, nintedanib; Veh, vehicle.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Lee YA, Wallace MC, Friedman SL. Pathobiology of liver fibrosis: a translational success story. Gut 2015;64:830‐841. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Godoy P, Hewitt NJ, Albrecht U, Andersen ME, Ansari N, Bhattacharya S, et al. Recent advances in 2D and 3D in vitro systems using primary hepatocytes, alternative hepatocyte sources and non‐parenchymal liver cells and their use in investigating mechanisms of hepatotoxicity, cell signaling and ADME. Arch Toxicol 2013;87:1315–1530. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Delire B, Starkel P, Leclercq I. Animal models for fibrotic liver diseases: what we have, what we need, and what is under development. J Clin Transl Hepatol 2015;3:53‐66. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mazza G, Al‐Akkad W, Rombouts K. Engineering in vitro models of hepatofibrogenesis. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2017;121:147‐157. - PubMed
    1. Olsen AL, Bloomer SA, Chan EP, Gaca MD, Georges PC, Sackey B, et al. Hepatic stellate cells require a stiff environment for myofibroblastic differentiation. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 2011;301:G110‐G118. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types