Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2019 Apr 9;321(14):1361-1369.
doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.2210.

Effect of Vitamin D Supplementation on Relapse-Free Survival Among Patients With Digestive Tract Cancers: The AMATERASU Randomized Clinical Trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Effect of Vitamin D Supplementation on Relapse-Free Survival Among Patients With Digestive Tract Cancers: The AMATERASU Randomized Clinical Trial

Mitsuyoshi Urashima et al. JAMA. .

Abstract

Importance: Randomized clinical trials of vitamin D supplementation for secondary prevention in patients with cancer are needed, given positive results of observational studies.

Objective: To determine whether postoperative vitamin D3 supplementation can improve survival of patients with digestive tract cancers overall and in subgroups stratified by 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25[OH]D) levels.

Design, setting, and participants: The AMATERASU trial, a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial conducted at a single university hospital in Japan. Enrollment began in January 2010 and follow-up was completed in February 2018. Patients aged 30 to 90 years with cancers of the digestive tract from the esophagus to the rectum, stages I to III, were recruited. Of 439 eligible patients, 15 declined and 7 were excluded after operation.

Interventions: Patients were randomized to receive oral supplemental capsules of vitamin D (2000 IU/d; n = 251) or placebo (n = 166) from the first postoperative outpatient visit to until the end of the trial.

Main outcomes and measures: The primary outcome was relapse-free survival time to relapse or death. The secondary outcome was overall survival time to death due to any cause. Subgroups analyzed had baseline serum 25(OH)D levels of 0 to less than 20 ng/mL, 20 to 40 ng/mL, and greater than 40 ng/mL; because of small sample size for the highest-baseline-level group, interactions were tested only between the low- and middle-baseline-level groups.

Results: All 417 randomized patients (mean age, 66 years; male, 66%; esophageal cancer, 10%; gastric cancer, 42%; colorectal cancer, 48%) were included in the analyses. There was 99.8% follow-up over a median 3.5 (interquartile range, 2.3-5.3) years, with maximal follow-up of 7.6 years. Relapse or death occurred in 50 patients (20%) randomized to vitamin D and 43 patients (26%) randomized to placebo. Death occurred in 37 (15%) in the vitamin D group and 25 (15%) in the placebo group. The 5-year relapse-free survival was 77% with vitamin D vs 69% with placebo (hazard ratio [HR] for relapse or death, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.50-1.14; P = .18). The 5-year overall survival in the vitamin D vs placebo groups was 82% vs 81% (HR for death, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.57-1.57; P = .83). In the subgroup of patients with baseline serum 25(OH)D levels between 20 and 40 ng/mL, the 5-year relapse-free survival was 85% with vitamin D vs 71% with placebo (HR for relapse or death, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.24-0.86; P = .02; P = .04 for interaction). Fractures occurred in 3 patients (1.3%) in the vitamin D group and 5 (3.4%) in the placebo group. Urinary stones occurred in 2 patients (0.9%) in the vitamin D group and 0 in the placebo group.

Conclusions and relevance: Among patients with digestive tract cancer, vitamin D supplementation, compared with placebo, did not result in significant improvement in relapse-free survival at 5 years.

Trial registration: UMIN Identifier: UMIN000001977.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: None reported.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Patient Flow Through the AMATERASU Trial
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Effect of Vitamin D Supplementation on Outcomes
Nelson-Aalen cumulative hazard curves are shown for (A) relapse or death and (B) total deaths. In panel C, the cumulative incidence of relapse is compared between the vitamin D and placebo groups by considering patient deaths due to causes other than relapse as the competing risk. Median observation times for relapse or death were, for placebo, 3.0 (interquartile range [IQR], 1.9-4.5) years, and for vitamin D, 3.3 (IQR, 1.9-5.3) years; for total deaths, for placebo, 3.5 (IQR, 2.3-5.0) years, and for vitamin D, 3.5 (IQR, 2.3-5.4) years; and for relapse by competing-risk analysis, for placebo, 3.0 (IQR, 1.9-4.5) years, and for vitamin D, 3.3 (IQR, 1.9-5.3) years.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.. Subgroup Analysis
Nelson-Aalen cumulative hazard curves are shown for relapse or death in the subgroups of (A) middle (20-40 ng/mL) and (B) low (<20 ng/mL) serum hydroxyvitamin D (25[OH]D) baseline levels and for total deaths in the subgroups of (C) middle and (D) low serum 25(OH)D baseline levels. There were only 5 patients with high (>40 ng/mL) 25(OH)D baseline levels; this group was not evaluated. Numbers at risk for panel C are not given because of weighting. Median observation times for relapse or death in the middle 25(OH)D subgroup were, for placebo, 3.4 (interquartile range [IQR], 1.9-4.5) years, and for vitamin D, 3.8 (IQR, 2.4-5.3) years; and in the low 25(OH)D subgroup, for placebo, 2.8 (IQR, 1.8-4.4) years, and for vitamin D, 2.5 (IQR, 1.6-5.2) years. Median observation times for total deaths in the middle 25(OH)D subgroup were, for placebo, 3.5 (IQR, 2.3-5.0) years, and for vitamin D, 3.8 (IQR, 2.5-5.4) years; and in the low 25(OH)D subgroup, for placebo, 3.4 (IQR, 2.1-5.0 years), and for vitamin D, 3.3 (IQR, 1.9-5.4) years.

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bikle D. Nonclassic actions of vitamin D. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2009;94(1):26-34. doi:10.1210/jc.2008-1454 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. van Harten-Gerritsen AS, Balvers MGJ, Witkamp RF, Kampman E, van Duijnhoven FJB. Vitamin D, inflammation, and colorectal cancer progression: a review of mechanistic studies and future directions for epidemiological studies. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2015;24(12):1820-1828. doi:10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-15-0601 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Garland CF, Comstock GW, Garland FC, Helsing KJ, Shaw EK, Gorham ED. Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D and colon cancer: eight-year prospective study. Lancet. 1989;2(8673):1176-1178. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(89)91789-3 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Giovannucci E, Liu Y, Rimm EB, et al. . Prospective study of predictors of vitamin D status and cancer incidence and mortality in men. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2006;98(7):451-459. doi:10.1093/jnci/djj101 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ng K, Meyerhardt JA, Wu K, et al. . Circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin d levels and survival in patients with colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(18):2984-2991. doi:10.1200/JCO.2007.15.1027 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms