Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2019 Apr 9:365:l1328.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.l1328.

Efficacy and safety of dual SGLT 1/2 inhibitor sotagliflozin in type 1 diabetes: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Efficacy and safety of dual SGLT 1/2 inhibitor sotagliflozin in type 1 diabetes: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

Giovanni Musso et al. BMJ. .

Abstract

Objective: To assess the efficacy and safety of dual sodium glucose cotransporter (SGLT) 1/2 inhibitor sotagliflozin in type 1 diabetes mellitus.

Design: Meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

Data sources: Medline; Cochrane Library; Embase; international meeting abstracts; international and national clinical trial registries; and websites of US, European, and Japanese regulatory authorities, up to 10 January 2019.

Eligibility criteria for selecting studies: Randomised controlled trials evaluating the effect of sotagliflozin versus active comparators or placebo on glycaemic and non-glycaemic outcomes and on adverse events in type 1 diabetes in participants older than 18. Three reviewers extracted data for study characteristics, outcomes of interest, and risk of bias and summarised strength of evidence using the grading of recommendations assessment, development, and evaluation approach. Main outcomes were pooled using random effects models.

Results: Of 739 records identified, six randomised placebo controlled trials (n=3238, duration 4-52 weeks) were included. Sotagliflozin reduced levels of glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c; weighted mean difference -0.34% (95% confidence interval -0.41% to -0.27%), P<0.001); fasting plasma glucose (-16.98 mg/dL, -22.1 to -11.9; 1 mg/dL=0.0555 mmol/L) and two hour-postprandial plasma glucose (-39.2 mg/dL, -50.4 to -28.1); and daily total, basal, and bolus insulin dose (-8.99%, -10.93% to -7.05%; -8.03%, -10.14% to -5.93%; -9.14%, -12.17% to -6.12%; respectively). Sotagliflozin improved time in range (weighted mean difference 9.73%, 6.66% to 12.81%) and other continuous glucose monitoring parameters, and reduced body weight (-3.54%, -3.98% to -3.09%), systolic blood pressure (-3.85 mm Hg, -4.76 to -2.93), and albuminuria (albumin:creatinine ratio -14.57 mg/g, -26.87 to -2.28). Sotagliflozin reduced hypoglycaemia (weighted mean difference -9.09 events per patient year, -13.82 to -4.36) and severe hypoglycaemia (relative risk 0.69, 0.49 to 0.98). However, the drug increased the risk of ketoacidosis (relative risk 3.93, 1.94 to 7.96), genital tract infections (3.12, 2.14 to 4.54), diarrhoea (1.50, 1.08 to 2.10), and volume depletion events (2.19, 1.10 to 4.36). Initial HbA1c and basal insulin dose adjustment were associated with the risk of diabetic ketoacidosis. A sotagliflozin dose of 400 mg/day was associated with a greater improvement in most glycaemic and non-glycaemic outcomes than the 200 mg/day dose, without increasing the risk of adverse events. The quality of evidence was high to moderate for most outcomes, but low for major adverse cardiovascular events and all cause death. The relatively short duration of trials prevented assessment of long term outcomes.

Conclusions: In type 1 diabetes, sotagliflozin improves glycaemic and non-glycaemic outcomes and reduces hypoglycaemia rate and severe hypoglycaemia. The risk of diabetic ketoacidosis could be minimised by appropriate patient selection and down-titration of the basal insulin dose.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form at www.icmje.org/coi_disclosure.pdf and declare: no support from any organisation for the submitted work; no financial relationships with any organisations that might have an interest in the submitted work in the previous three years; no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1
Flow diagram of evidence acquisition during study
Fig 2
Fig 2
Forest plot comparing effect of sotagliflozin versus placebo on HbA1c (%), fasting plasma glucose (FPG), and two hour-postprandial plasma glucose (2h-PPG).1 mg/dL=0.0555 mmol/L. IV=inverse variance
Fig 3
Fig 3
Forest plot comparing effect of sotagliflozin versus placebo on body weight, systolic blood pressure (sysBP), and diastolic blood pressure (diaBP). IV=inverse invariance
Fig 4
Fig 4
Forest plot comparing effect of sotagliflozin versus placebo on estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and urinary albumin:creatinine ratio (ACR). IV=inverse invariance
Fig 5
Fig 5
Forest plot comparing effect of sotagliflozin versus placebo on hypoglycaemia, severe hypoglycaemia, and diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA). IV=inverse invariance; M-H=Mantel-Haenszel
Fig 6
Fig 6
Forest plot comparing effect of sotagliflozin versus placebo on urinary tract infection (UTI) and genital tract infection (GTI). M-H=Mantel-Haenszel
None

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. US Center for Disease Control and Prevention 2019. https://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/library/socialmedia/infographics.html.
    1. Turner R, Stratton I, Horton V, et al. UK Prospective Diabetes Study Group UKPDS 25: autoantibodies to islet-cell cytoplasm and glutamic acid decarboxylase for prediction of insulin requirement in type 2 diabetes. Lancet 1997;350:1288-93. 10.1016/S0140-6736(97)03062-6 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Miller KM, Foster NC, Beck RW, et al. T1D Exchange Clinic Network Current state of type 1 diabetes treatment in the US: updated data from the T1D Exchange clinic registry. Diabetes Care 2015;38:971-8. 10.2337/dc15-0078 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lind M, Svensson AM, Kosiborod M, et al. Glycemic control and excess mortality in type 1 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2014;371:1972-82. 10.1056/NEJMoa1408214 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Nathan DM, DCCT/EDIC Research Group The diabetes control and complications trial/epidemiology of diabetes interventions and complications study at 30 years: overview. Diabetes Care 2014;37:9-16. 10.2337/dc13-2112 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms

Substances