Managing nitrogen through cover crop species selection in the U.S. mid-Atlantic

PLoS One. 2019 Apr 12;14(4):e0215448. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0215448. eCollection 2019.

Abstract

Cover crops have the potential to be agricultural nitrogen (N) regulators that reduce leaching through soils and then deliver N to subsequent cash crops. Yet, regulating N in this way has proven difficult because the few cover crop species that are well-studied excel at either reducing N leaching or increasing N supply to cash crops, but they fail to excel at both simultaneously. We hypothesized that mixed species cover crop stands might balance the N fixing and N scavenging capabilities of individual species. We tested six cover crop monocultures and four mixtures for their effects on N cycling in an organically managed maize-soybean-wheat feed grain rotation in Pennsylvania, USA. For three years, we used a suite of integrated approaches to quantify N dynamics, including extractable soil inorganic N, buried anion exchange resins, bucket lysimeters, and plant N uptake. All cover crop species, including legume monocultures, reduced N leaching compared to fallow plots. Cereal rye monocultures reduced N leaching to buried resins by 90% relative to fallow; notably, mixtures with just a low seeding rate of rye did almost as well. Austrian winter pea monocultures increased N uptake in maize silage by 40 kg N ha-1 relative to fallow, and conversely rye monocultures decreased N uptake into maize silage by 40 kg N ha-1 relative to fallow. Importantly, cover crop mixtures had larger impacts on leaching reduction than on maize N uptake, when compared to fallow plots. For example, a three-species mixture of pea, red clover, and rye had similar maize N uptake to fallow plots, but leaching rates were 80% lower in this mixture than fallow plots. Our results show clearly that cover crop species selection and mixture design can substantially mitigate tradeoffs between N retention and N supply to cash crops, providing a powerful tool for managing N in temperate cropping systems.

Publication types

  • Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.

MeSH terms

  • Agriculture / methods
  • Crops, Agricultural / growth & development*
  • Crops, Agricultural / metabolism*
  • Edible Grain / growth & development
  • Edible Grain / metabolism
  • Fertilizers / analysis
  • Glycine max / growth & development
  • Glycine max / metabolism
  • Nitrogen / metabolism*
  • Nitrogen Cycle*
  • Pennsylvania
  • Pisum sativum / growth & development
  • Pisum sativum / metabolism
  • Secale / growth & development
  • Secale / metabolism
  • Soil / chemistry
  • Species Specificity
  • Trifolium / growth & development
  • Trifolium / metabolism
  • Triticum / growth & development
  • Triticum / metabolism
  • Zea mays / growth & development
  • Zea mays / metabolism

Substances

  • Fertilizers
  • Soil
  • Nitrogen

Grants and funding

This project was primarily funded by grants from the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture (https://nifa.usda.gov/) to JK (2011-51300-30638 and 2015-51300-24156). Additional funding was provided by USDA NIFA grant 2012-67012-22889 to MS. This material is based on work supported by the National Science Foundation (https://www.nsf.gov/) under Grant no. DGE1255832 to MH. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.