Trends in Sedentary Behavior Among the US Population, 2001-2016
- PMID: 31012934
- PMCID: PMC6487546
- DOI: 10.1001/jama.2019.3636
Trends in Sedentary Behavior Among the US Population, 2001-2016
Abstract
Importance: Prolonged sitting, particularly watching television or videos, has been associated with increased risk of multiple diseases and mortality. However, changes in sedentary behaviors over time have not been well described in the United States.
Objective: To evaluate patterns and temporal trends in sedentary behaviors and sociodemographic and lifestyle correlates in the US population.
Design, setting, and participants: A serial, cross-sectional analysis of the US nationally representative data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) among children aged 5 through 11 years (2001-2016); adolescents, 12 through 19 years (2003-2016); and adults, 20 years or older (2003-2016).
Exposures: Survey cycle.
Main outcomes and measures: Prevalence of sitting watching television or videos for 2 h/d or more, computer use outside work or school for 1 h/d or more, and total sitting time (h/d in those aged ≥12 years).
Results: Data on 51 896 individuals (mean, 37.2 years [SE, 0.19]; 25 968 [50%] female) were analyzed from 2001-2016 NHANES data, including 10 359 children, 9639 adolescents, and 31 898 adults. The estimated prevalence of sitting watching television or videos for 2 h/d or more was high among all ages (children, 62% [95% CI, 57% to 67%]; adolescents, 59% [95% CI, 54% to 65%]; adults, 65% [95% CI, 61% to 69%]; adults aged 20-64 years, 62% [95% CI, 58% to 66%]; and ≥65 years, 84% [95% CI, 81% to 88%] in the 2015-2016 cycle). From 2001 through 2016, the trends decreased among children over time (difference, -3.4% [95% CI, -11% to 4.5%]; P for trend =.004), driven by non-Hispanic white children; were stable among adolescents (-4.8% [95% CI, -12% to 2.3%]; P for trend =.60) and among adults aged 20 through 64 years (-0.7% [95% CI, -5.6% to 4.1%]; P for trend =.82); but increased among adults aged 65 years or older (difference, 3.5% [95% CI, -1.2% to 8.1%]; P for trend =.03). The estimated prevalence of computer use outside school or work for 1 h/d or more increased in all ages (children, 43% [95% CI, 40% to 46%] to 56% [95% CI, 49% to 63%] from 2001 to 2016; difference, 13% [95% CI, 5.6% to 21%]; P for trend <.001; adolescents, 53% [95% CI, 47% to 58%] to 57% [95% CI, 53% to 62%] from 2003 to 2016, difference, 4.8% [95% CI, -1.8% to 11%]; P for trend =.002; adults, 29% [27% to 32%] to 50% [48% to 53%] from 2003 to 2016, difference, 21% [95% CI, 18% to 25%]; P for trend <.001). From 2007 to 2016, total hours per day of sitting time increased among adolescents (7.0 [95% CI, 6.7 to 7.4] to 8.2 [95% CI, 7.9 to 8.4], difference, 1.1 [95% CI, 0.7 to 1.5]) and adults (5.5 [95% CI, 5.2 to 5.7] to 6.4 [95% CI, 6.2 to 6.6]; difference, 1.0 [95% CI, 0.7 to 1.3]; P for trend <.001 for both).
Conclusions and relevance: In this nationally representative survey of the US population from 2001 through 2016, the estimated prevalence of sitting watching television or videos for at least 2 hours per day generally remained high and stable. The estimated prevalence of computer use during leisure-time increased among all age groups, and the estimated total sitting time increased among adolescents and adults.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures
Similar articles
-
Association of sedentary patterns with body fat distribution among US children and adolescents: a population-based study.Int J Obes (Lond). 2021 Sep;45(9):2048-2057. doi: 10.1038/s41366-021-00874-7. Epub 2021 Jun 14. Int J Obes (Lond). 2021. PMID: 34127804 Free PMC article.
-
Associations in physical activity and sedentary behaviour among the immigrant and non-immigrant US population.J Epidemiol Community Health. 2020 Aug;74(8):655-661. doi: 10.1136/jech-2020-213754. Epub 2020 Apr 25. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2020. PMID: 32335510
-
Trends in Adherence to the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans for Aerobic Activity and Time Spent on Sedentary Behavior Among US Adults, 2007 to 2016.JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Jul 3;2(7):e197597. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.7597. JAMA Netw Open. 2019. PMID: 31348504 Free PMC article.
-
Sedentary behaviour in youth.Br J Sports Med. 2011 Sep;45(11):906-13. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2011-090192. Br J Sports Med. 2011. PMID: 21836174 Review.
-
Sedentary behaviour and cardiovascular disease: a review of prospective studies.Int J Epidemiol. 2012 Oct;41(5):1338-53. doi: 10.1093/ije/dys078. Epub 2012 May 26. Int J Epidemiol. 2012. PMID: 22634869 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Meeting people where they are: Crowdsourcing goal-specific personalized wellness practices.PLOS Digit Health. 2024 Nov 19;3(11):e0000650. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000650. eCollection 2024 Nov. PLOS Digit Health. 2024. PMID: 39561203 Free PMC article.
-
Sitting less and moving more: the impact of physical activity on mortality in the population of Spain.BMC Public Health. 2024 Nov 12;24(1):3140. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-20600-y. BMC Public Health. 2024. PMID: 39533197 Free PMC article.
-
Neighborhood Social and Physical Environments and Sedentary Behaviors: Importance of Early Childhood in Shaping Health Behaviors.J Urban Health. 2024 Nov 1. doi: 10.1007/s11524-024-00929-w. Online ahead of print. J Urban Health. 2024. PMID: 39485644
-
Exploration of physical activity, sedentary behavior and insulin level among short sleepers.Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2024 Oct 14;15:1371682. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1371682. eCollection 2024. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2024. PMID: 39469577 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluating the Psychometric Properties of a Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior Identity Scale: Survey Study With Two Independent Samples of Adults in the United States.JMIR Form Res. 2024 Oct 24;8:e59950. doi: 10.2196/59950. JMIR Form Res. 2024. PMID: 39446463 Free PMC article.
References
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
