Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
, 16 (2), 279-298

Editors Should Declare Conflicts of Interest

Affiliations

Editors Should Declare Conflicts of Interest

Jaime A Teixeira da Silva et al. J Bioeth Inq.

Abstract

Editors have increasing pressure as scholarly publishing tries to shore up trust and reassure academics and the public that traditional peer review is robust, fail-safe, and corrective. Hidden conflicts of interest (COIs) may skew the fairness of the publishing process because they could allow the status of personal or professional relationships to positively influence the outcome of peer review or reduce the processing period of this process. Not all authors have such privileged relationships. In academic journals, editors usually have very specialized skills and are selected as agents of trust, entrusted with the responsibility of serving as quality control gate-keepers during peer review. In many cases, editors form extensive networks, either with other professionals, industry, academic bodies, journals, or publishers. Such networks and relationships may influence their decisions or even their subjectivity towards a set of submitting authors, paper, or institute, ultimately influencing the peer review process. These positions and relationships are not simply aspects of a curriculum, they are potential COIs. Thus, on the editorial board of all academic journals, editors should carry a COI statement that reflects their past history, as well as actual relationships and positions that they have, as these may influence their editorial functions.

Keywords: Accountability; Editorial responsibility; Peer review; Quality control; Transparency.

Conflict of interest statement

Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva was the former founder and CEO/CSO/EIC of Global Science Books (www.globalscienceboks.info). Radha Holla Bhar is a founding member of the Alliance Against Conflict of Interest (AACI), but her ideas in this paper do not necessarily reflect the positions or ideas of AACI. Apart from this, the authors declare no other conflicts of interest. Charles T. Mehlman is the course director for an orthopaedic surgery board review course (Oakstone Publishing), performs rare/intermittent expert witness testimony, and he serves on the editorial boards of several journals including Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma, Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics, The Spine Journal, and Journal of Children’s Orthopaedics.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by 1 article

References

    1. Al-Khatib, A., and J.A. Teixeira da Silva. 2017. Threats to the survival of the author-pays-journal to publish model. Publishing Research Quarterly 33(1): 64–70.
    1. Alfonso, F. A. Timmis and F.J. Pinto, Editors’ Network European Society of Cardiology Task Force, et al. 2012. Conflict of interest policies and disclosure requirements among European Society of Cardiology National Cardiovascular Journals. European Heart Journal 33(5): 587–594. - PubMed
    1. Amigo, I., and A. Pascual-García. 2017. Conflicts of interest in scientific publishing. EMBO Reports 18(12): 2081–2083. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ancker, J.S., and A. Flanagin. 2007. A comparison of conflict of interest policies at peer-reviewed journals in different scientific disciplines. Science and Engineering Ethics 13(2): 147–157. - PubMed
    1. Arend, R.J. 2019. Conflicts of interest as corrupting the checks and balances in the post-publication oversight of academic business journals. Journal of Management Inquiry 28(1): 57–66.

LinkOut - more resources

Feedback