Lower Hospitalization and Healthcare Costs With Sacubitril/Valsartan Versus Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitor or Angiotensin-Receptor Blocker in a Retrospective Analysis of Patients With Heart Failure

J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 May 7;8(9):e011089. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.011089.

Abstract

Background Outcomes data among patients with heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction treated with sacubitril/valsartan ( SAC / VAL ) are largely limited to clinical trial results. We compared hospitalization and healthcare costs among real-world patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction treated with SAC / VAL versus angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin-receptor blocker ( ACEI / ARB ). Methods and Results Using retrospective administrative claims data, stable patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction treated with SAC / VAL or ACEI / ARB from October 2015 to June 2016 were identified. Postindex hospitalization and healthcare costs were assessed in propensity-matched cohorts using robust variance estimation. Time to first hospitalization was modeled using unadjusted Kaplan-Meier estimates and multivariable models. Postindex all-cause healthcare costs were modeled using an adjusted multivariable model. Among 279 patients per matched cohort, postindex hospitalization risk was lower for SAC / VAL compared with ACEI / ARB using Kaplan-Meier estimation and unadjusted Cox models. For HF hospitalization, the hazard ratio (95% CI) was 0.56 (0.33-0.94; P=0.030). Adjusted results were similar to unadjusted. Mean ( SD ) monthly healthcare costs were lower for SAC / VAL versus ACEI / ARB for all categories except pharmacy, with hospital costs being particularly disparate between cohorts: for HF hospitalization, $248 ($1588) for SAC / VAL versus $1122 ($7290) for ACEI / ARB . The adjusted risk of incurring increased all-cause postindex costs was lower for SAC / VAL versus ACEI / ARB (cost ratio [95% CI] 0.74 [0.59-0.94]; P=0.013). Conclusions In clinical practice, patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction treated with SAC / VAL were less likely to be hospitalized than matched patients treated with ACEI / ARB . Despite higher pharmacy costs, SAC / VAL -treated patients incurred lower monthly medical and total healthcare costs.

Keywords: healthcare costs; heart failure; hospitalization; retrospective studies; sacubitril/valsartan.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Aminobutyrates / therapeutic use*
  • Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists / therapeutic use*
  • Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors / therapeutic use*
  • Biphenyl Compounds
  • Drug Combinations
  • Female
  • Health Care Costs / statistics & numerical data*
  • Heart Failure / drug therapy*
  • Heart Failure / physiopathology
  • Hospitalization / statistics & numerical data*
  • Humans
  • Kaplan-Meier Estimate
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Proportional Hazards Models
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Stroke Volume
  • Tetrazoles / therapeutic use*
  • United States
  • Valsartan

Substances

  • Aminobutyrates
  • Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists
  • Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors
  • Biphenyl Compounds
  • Drug Combinations
  • Tetrazoles
  • Valsartan
  • sacubitril and valsartan sodium hydrate drug combination