Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 Mar;7(2):10.1128/microbiolspec.gpp3-0008-2018.
doi: 10.1128/microbiolspec.GPP3-0008-2018.

The Dream of a Mycobacterium

Affiliations
Review

The Dream of a Mycobacterium

Catherine Baranowski et al. Microbiol Spectr. 2019 Mar.

Abstract

How do mycobacteria divide? Cell division has been studied extensively in the model rod-shaped bacteria Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis, but much less is understood about cell division in mycobacteria, a genus that includes the major human pathogens M. tuberculosis and M. leprae. In general, bacterial cell division requires the concerted effort of many proteins in both space and time to elongate the cell, replicate and segregate the chromosome, and construct and destruct the septum - processes which result in the creation of two new daughter cells. Here, we describe these distinct stages of cell division in B. subtilis and follow with the current knowledge in mycobacteria. As will become apparent, there are many differences between mycobacteria and B. subtilis in terms of both the broad outline of cell division and the molecular details. So, while the fundamental challenge of spatially and temporally organizing cell division is shared between these rod-shaped bacteria, they have solved these challenges in often vastly different ways.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Characteristics of growth and division in B. subtilis and mycobacteria. B. subtilis and E. coli grow by adding new cell wall (gray) along the lateral cell body. Mycobacteria grow only at the polar regions, and do so at unequal amounts depending on the identity of the pole. This is observed by using a cell wall dye (green) to stain the existing cell wall and observe outgrowth of the newly synthesized, unstained cell wall (7). Arrows, polar location of new cell wall synthesis (a large arrow indicates more growth); dotted line, septum; green portion, old cell wall; gray portion, new cell wall.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Polar growth segregates the cell wall based on age. (Top) Fluorescent d-amino acids are thought to incorporate into nascent PG. Pulse chase with these shows how the new and old cell walls are spatially segregated in M. smegmatis (Baranowski C, Rego EH, and Rubin EJ, unpublished images). (Bottom) Alexa-488 NHS ester stains the existing cell wall (green). New cell wall is unstained and can be monitored using time-lapse microscopy. After two divisions, the oldest cell wall is inherited by the new pole daughter cells (*) in M. smegmatis. (Baranowski, Rego, and Rubin. unpublished images; 7).
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Mycobacterial divisome interactions. A schematic of mycobacterial divisome protein interactions. Note that interactions are not necessarily direct given the available data. Gray dotted lines, physical interactions; red dotted lines, negative regulation; brown lines, FtsQ pulldown proteins (44); blue text, cell wall enzymes; orange text, kinases.
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
Mycobacterial divisome and elongasome members. (Top) Schematic of proteins involved in mycobacterial cell division. Proteins marked with an asterisk (*) have been shown to interact with FtsZ. The FtsZ ring is illustrated as a dark gray circle upon which the divisome members are arranged. (Bottom) Schematic of proteins involved in mycobacterial elongation. Interacting proteins are depicted touching, and proteins with a question mark (?) may belong in these complexes, but data are limited.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Jacob F. 1965. Leçon inaugurale: faite le vendredi 7 mai 1965 (Collège de France).
    1. Hirota Y, Ryter A, Jacob F. 1968. Thermosensitive mutants of E. coli affected in the processes of DNA synthesis and cellular division. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol 33:677–693 10.1101/SQB.1968.033.01.077. [PubMed]10.1101/SQB.1968.033.01.077 - DOI - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bi EF, Lutkenhaus J. 1991. FtsZ ring structure associated with division in Escherichia coli. Nature 354:161–164 10.1038/354161a0. [PubMed]10.1038/354161a0 - DOI - DOI - PubMed
    1. Blaauwen den T, Hamoen LW, Levin PA. 2017. The divisome at 25: the road ahead. Curr Opin Microbiol 36:85–94. [PubMed]10.1016/j.mib.2017.01.007 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kieser KJ, Rubin EJ. 2014. How sisters grow apart: mycobacterial growth and division. Nat Rev Microbiol 12:550–562 10.1038/nrmicro3299. [PubMed]10.1038/nrmicro3299 - DOI - DOI - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources