Breaking Bad: A Comparative Descriptive Analysis of Periprosthetic Fractures Around Cemented and Uncemented Femoral Stems

J Arthroplasty. 2019 Aug;34(8):1783-1786. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.03.051. Epub 2019 Mar 28.

Abstract

Background: Periprosthetic fractures are most commonly classified according to the Vancouver classification system and more recently the Unified Classification System. The aim of this study is to provide a descriptive analysis of fracture patterns in femoral periprosthetic fractures (PPFs) by femoral stem fixation.

Methods: A retrospective observational study of all femoral PPFs over a 10-year period at our institution was conducted. Presenting radiographs were examined to assess the fracture pattern.

Results: Over the 10-year period, 138 femoral PPFs that underwent operative treatment were examined. Mean age of patients was 78 years with 45.7% male and median American Society of Anaesthesiologists grade 3. The femoral stem fixation was cemented in 83 patients and uncemented in 55 patients. Uncemented femoral stems most commonly caused a simple oblique fracture pattern (69.1%) with a more comminuted pattern seen in cemented fixation (59%).

Conclusion: Fracture patterns differ according to femoral stem fixation. A simple "sickle-like" oblique fracture pattern was more commonly seen in uncemented stems while cemented tapered stems resulted in a comminuted "axe splitting" pattern.

Keywords: cemented; fracture; pattern; periprosthetic; uncemented.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Observational Study

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip / adverse effects*
  • Female
  • Femoral Fractures / surgery
  • Femur / surgery*
  • Fractures, Comminuted / surgery
  • Hip Prosthesis / adverse effects*
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Periprosthetic Fractures / surgery*
  • Radiography
  • Retrospective Studies