Good Outcome in Cardiac Arrest Patients in Refractory Status Epilepticus: A Result of Aggressive Treatment or EEG Reclassification

Epilepsy Curr. 2019 May-Jun;19(3):168-170. doi: 10.1177/1535759719843323. Epub 2019 Apr 29.

Abstract

Neurologic outcome of postanoxic refractory status epilepticus after aggressive treatment. Beretta S, Coppo A, Bianchi E, et al. Neurology. 2018;91(23):e2153-e2162. doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000006615. Epub October 31, 2018.

Objective: To investigate neurologic outcome of patients with cardiac arrest with refractory status epilepticus (RSE) treated with a standardized aggressive protocol with antiepileptic drugs and anesthetics compared to patients with other electroencephalogram (EEG) patterns.

Methods: In the prospective cohort study, 166 consecutive patients with cardiac arrest in coma were stratified according to 4 independent EEG patterns (benign, RSE, generalized periodic discharges [GPDs], malignant nonepileptiform) and multimodal prognostic indicators. Primary outcomes were survival and cerebral performance category (CPC) at 6 months.

Results: The RSE occurred in 36 (21.7%) patients and was treated with an aggressive standardized protocol as long as multimodal prognostic indicators were not unfavorable. The RSE started 3 ± 2.3 days after cardiac arrest and lasted 4.7 ± 4.3 days. A benign EEG pattern was recorded in 76 (45.8%) patients, a periodic pattern (GPDs) was seen in 13 (7.8%) patients, and a malignant nonepileptiform EEG pattern was recorded in 41 (24.7%) patients. The 4 EEG patterns were highly associated with different prognostic indicators (low-flow time, clinical motor seizures, N20 responses, neuron-specific enolase, neuroimaging). Survival and good neurologic outcome (CPC 1 or 2) at 6 months were 72.4% and 71.1% for benign EEG pattern, 54.3% and 44.4% for RSE, 15.4% and 0% for GPDs, and 2.4% and 0% for malignant nonepileptiform EEG pattern, respectively.

Conclusions: Aggressive and prolonged treatment of RSE may be justified in patients with cardiac arrest with favorable multimodal prognostic indicators.

Publication types

  • Comment