Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Apr 9:6:102.
doi: 10.3389/fvets.2019.00102. eCollection 2019.

Prevalence and Serotype Diversity of Salmonella in Apparently Healthy Cattle: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Published Studies, 2000-2017

Affiliations
Free PMC article

Prevalence and Serotype Diversity of Salmonella in Apparently Healthy Cattle: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Published Studies, 2000-2017

Fanta D Gutema et al. Front Vet Sci. .
Free PMC article

Erratum in

Abstract

Salmonellosis is a leading cause of foodborne illnesses in humans with cattle being one of the reservoirs for Salmonella. We estimated a pooled prevalence of Salmonella in apparently healthy cattle and examined serotype diversity through systematic review and meta-analysis of studies published between 2000 and 2017. Peer reviewed publications reporting the prevalence of Salmonella in cattle were searched through five electronic databases (PubMed, Google scholar, Agricola, Scopus, CAB direct) and through manual search. We obtained 71 publications with 75 datasets consisting a total of 52,766 animals examined and 5,010 Salmonella positive cattle from 29 countries in six continents (except from Antarctica). Pooled prevalence of Salmonella in cattle was 9% (95% confidence interval: 7-11%). Significantly high heterogeneity (I 2 = 98.7%, P < 0.01) was observed among all studies as well as within continents. Prevalence varied from 2% (Europe) to 16% (North America). Overall, 143 different serotypes were reported with the most diverse serotypes being reported from Africa (76 different serotypes) followed by North America (49 serotypes). The 10 most frequently reported serotypes (Montevideo, Typhimurium, Kentucky, Meleagridis, Anatum, Cerro, Mbandaka, Muenster, Newport, and Senftenberg) accounted for 65% of the isolates for which specific serotype information was reported. Salmonella Montevideo and S. Dublin are the most frequently reported serotypes in North America and Europe, respectively, while S. Typhimurium was the most frequent in Africa, Asia and Australasia. Our results indicated variability both in the prevalence and serotype diversity of Salmonella in cattle across continents. Although all Salmonella serotypes are potentially pathogenic to humans, five (Montevideo, Typhimurium, Anatum, Mbandaka, and Newport) of the top 10 serotypes identified in this study are among the serotypes most commonly associated with clinical illnesses in humans.

Keywords: Salmonella; cattle; meta-analysis; prevalence; serotypes; systematic review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow diagram for the selection of studies included in the meta-analysis for the prevalence of Salmonella in apparently healthy cattle.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Forest plot showing estimated individual and overall Salmonella prevalence in apparently healthy cattle (ES, effect size; CI, confidence interval; I2, Inverse variance index).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Glavin MO. A single microbial sea: food safety as a global concern. SAIS Rev. (2003) 23:203–20. 10.1353/sais.2003.0012 - DOI
    1. Kirk MD, Pires SM, Black RE, Caipo M, Crump JA, Devleesschauwer B, et al. World Health Organization estimates of the global and regional disease burden of 22 foodborne bacterial, protozoal, and viral diseases, 2010: a data synthesis. PLoS Med. (2015) 12:e1001940 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001940 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. D'Aoust JY. Salmonella. In: Lund BM, Baire-Parker AC, Gould GW, editors. The Microbiology Safety and Quality of Food. Gaithersburg, MD: Aspen Publishers; (1999). p. 1233–99.
    1. Schlundt J, Toyofuku H, Jansen J, Herbst SA. Emerging food-borne zoonoses. Rev Sci Tech. (2004) 23:513–34. 10.20506/rst.23.2.1506 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rosel K, Delia G. Can Participation Improve Food Safety?. Food Safety and Informal Markets: Animal Products In Sub-Saharan Africa. (2014). Available online at: https://cgspace.cgiar.org/handle/10568/42438

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources