Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Feb 3;9(5):2615-2628.
doi: 10.1002/ece3.4928. eCollection 2019 Mar.

Interactions among morphotype, nutrition, and temperature impact fitness of an invasive fly

Affiliations

Interactions among morphotype, nutrition, and temperature impact fitness of an invasive fly

Dalila Rendon et al. Ecol Evol. .

Abstract

Invasive animals depend on finding a balanced nutritional intake to colonize, survive, and reproduce in new environments. This can be especially challenging during situations of fluctuating cold temperatures and food scarcity, but phenotypic plasticity may offer an adaptive advantage during these periods. We examined how lifespan, fecundity, pre-oviposition periods, and body nutrient contents were affected by dietary protein and carbohydrate (P:C) ratios at variable low temperatures in two morphs (winter morphs WM and summer morphs SM) of an invasive fly, Drosophila suzukii. The experimental conditions simulated early spring after overwintering and autumn, crucial periods for survival. At lower temperatures, post-overwintering WM lived longer on carbohydrate-only diets and had higher fecundity on low-protein diets, but there was no difference in lifespan or fecundity among diets for SM. As temperatures increased, low-protein diets resulted in higher fecundity without compromising lifespan, while high-protein diets reduced lifespan and fecundity for both WM and SM. Both SM and WM receiving high-protein diets had lower sugar, lipid, and glycogen (but similar protein) body contents compared to flies receiving low-protein and carbohydrate-only diets. This suggests that flies spend energy excreting excess dietary protein, thereby affecting lifespan and fecundity. Despite having to recover from nutrient depletion after an overwintering period, WM exhibited longer lifespan and higher fecundity than SM in favorable diets and temperatures. WM exposed to favorable low-protein diet had higher body sugar, lipid, and protein body contents than SM, which is possibly linked to better performance. Although protein is essential for oogenesis, WM and SM flies receiving low-protein diets did not have shorter pre-oviposition periods compared to flies on carbohydrate-only diets. Finding adequate carbohydrate sources to compensate protein intake is essential for the successful persistence of D. suzukii WM and SM populations during suboptimal temperatures.

Keywords: Drosophila suzukii; carbohydrates; fecundity; lifespan; overwintering; protein.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Drosophila suzukii WM and SM lifespan in variable diets and temperatures. The box represents the interquartile range, the line in the middle is the median, and whiskers represent extreme values within 1.5 times the interquartile range. Different lowercase letters represent differences between diets for each temperature (separately for WM and SM); different uppercase letters represent differences between temperatures for each diet (separately for WM and SM). The number represents sample size for each treatment. Asterisks represent diet and temperature treatments where SM and WM were significantly different
Figure 2
Figure 2
Drosophila suzukii WM and SM fecundity in variable diets and temperatures (total egg lay, mean ± SE). Different lowercase letters represent differences between diets for each temperature (separately for WM and SM); different uppercase letters represent differences between temperatures for each diet (separately for WM and SM). The number represents sample size for each treatment. Asterisks represent diet and temperature treatments where SM and WM were significantly different
Figure 3
Figure 3
Drosophila suzukii WM and SM pre‐oviposition period in variable diets and temperatures (calendar days, mean ± SE). Different lowercase letters represent differences between diets for each temperature (separately for WM and SM); different uppercase letters represent differences between temperatures for each diet (separately for WM and SM). The number represents sample size for each treatment. Asterisks represent diet and temperature treatments where SM and WM were significantly different
Figure 4
Figure 4
Drosophila suzukii winter (WM) and summer morph (SM) total body content of protein, sugar, lipid, and glycogen exposed to different diets (Protein:Carbohydrate 0:0, 0:1, 1:4, 1:2, 1:1; mean ± SE) for seven days at 17°C. Bars with same letters within each nutrient are not significantly different (Tukey HSD). Asterisks represent significant differences between WM and SM within each diet (t test).
Figure 5
Figure 5
Weekly total body content of protein, sugar, lipid, and glycogen in Drosophila suzukii WM females during five weeks of overwintering at 1°C

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Allen, M. J. (2007). What makes a fly enter diapause? Fly, 1, 307–310. 10.4161/fly.5532 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bates, D. , Machler, M. , Bolker, B. M. , & Walker, S. C. (2015). Fitting Linear Mixed‐Effects Models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67, 1–48.
    1. Beukeboom, L. W. (2018). What makes an insect invasive? An introduction. Entomologia Experimentalis Et Applicata, 166, 149–150. 10.1111/eea.12667 - DOI
    1. Bing, X. L. , Gerlach, J. , Loeb, G. , & Buchon, N. (2018). Nutrient‐dependent impact of microbes on Drosophila suzukii development. Mbio, 9, e02199‐17 10.1128/mBio.02199-17 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bruce, K. D. , Hoxha, S. , Carvalho, G. B. , Yamada, R. , Wang, H. D. , Karayan, P. , … Ja, W. W. (2013). High carbohydrate‐low protein consumption maximizes Drosophila lifespan. Experimental Gerontology, 48, 1129–1135. 10.1016/j.exger.2013.02.003 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources