Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2019 May 7;321(17):1686-1692.
doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.4755.

Effect of a Single Aspirin Dose Prior to Fecal Immunochemical Testing on Test Sensitivity for Detecting Advanced Colorectal Neoplasms: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Effect of a Single Aspirin Dose Prior to Fecal Immunochemical Testing on Test Sensitivity for Detecting Advanced Colorectal Neoplasms: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Hermann Brenner et al. JAMA. .

Abstract

Importance: Fecal immunochemical tests for hemoglobin are widely used for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. Observational studies suggested that sensitivity of fecal immunochemical tests for detecting advanced neoplasms could be increased by acetylsalicylic acid (aspirin), especially among men.

Objective: To evaluate the potential to increase sensitivity of fecal immunochemical tests by administering a single 300-mg oral aspirin dose 2 days before stool sampling.

Design, setting, and participants: A randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial was conducted in 14 gastroenterology practices and 4 hospitals in Germany, and included 2422 men and women aged 40 to 80 years scheduled for colonoscopy, with no recent use of aspirin or other drugs with antithrombotic effects (enrollment from June 2013 to November 2016, and final follow-up January 27, 2017).

Interventions: Administration of a single tablet containing 300 mg of aspirin (n = 1208) or placebo (n = 1214) 2 days before fecal sampling for fecal immunochemical test.

Main outcome and measures: The primary outcome was sensitivity of a quantitative fecal immunochemical test at 2 predefined cutoffs (10.2 and 17-μg Hb/g stool) for detecting advanced neoplasms (colorectal cancer or advanced adenoma).

Results: Among 2422 randomized patients (mean [SD] age, 59.6 [7.9] years; 1219, 50%, men), 2134 were included in the analysis (78% for primary screening colonoscopy, 22% for diagnostic colonoscopy). Advanced neoplasms were identified in 224 participants (10.5%), including 8 participants (0.4%) with CRC and 216 participants (10.1%) with advanced adenoma. Sensitivity was 40.2% in the aspirin group and 30.4% in the placebo group (difference 9.8%, 95% CI, -3.1% to 22.2%, P = .14) at cutoff 10.2-μg Hb/g stool and 28.6% in the aspirin and 22.5% in the placebo group (difference 6.0%, 95% CI, -5.7% to 17.5%, P = .32) at cutoff 17-μg Hb/g stool.

Conclusions and relevance: Among adults aged 40 to 80 years not using aspirin or other antithrombotic medications, administration of a single dose of oral aspirin prior to fecal immunochemical testing, compared with placebo, did not significantly increase test sensitivity for detecting advanced colorectal neoplasms at 2 predefined cutoffs of a quantitative fecal immunochemical test.

Trial registration: Deutsches Register Klinischer Studien Identifier: DRKS00003252; EudraCT Identifier: 2011-005603-32/DE.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Brenner reported receiving grants from the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research, the German Cancer Aid, the European Commission, the US National Institutes of Health, Applied Proteomics, Roche Diagnostics, Volition, and Goodgut during the conduct of the study. Dr Calderazzo reported receiving grants from the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research and Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft during the conduct of the study. Dr Seufferlein reported receiving grants and personal fees from Celgene and Sanofi-Genzyme; personal fees from Roche, Bayer, Merck-Serono, and Novartis; and grants from Amgen and Boehringer Ingelheim outside the submitted work. Dr Kopp-Schneider reported receiving grants from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft and the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research during the conduct of the study. No other disclosures were reported.

Figures

Figure.
Figure.. Flow Diagram of Recruitment and Exclusions
aThe number of participants assessed for eligibility was not collected. bPatients who did not contribute with any sample or information were considered as dropouts. cPatients who completed the colonoscopy were considered to have been followed up.

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68(6):394-424. doi:10.3322/caac.21492 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hewitson P, Glasziou P, Watson E, Towler B, Irwig L. Cochrane systematic review of colorectal cancer screening using the fecal occult blood test (hemoccult): an update. Am J Gastroenterol. 2008;103(6):1541-1549. doi:10.1111/j.1572-0241.2008.01875.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Scholefield JH, Moss SM, Mangham CM, Whynes DK, Hardcastle JD. Nottingham trial of faecal occult blood testing for colorectal cancer: a 20-year follow-up. Gut. 2012;61(7):1036-1040. doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2011-300774 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Shaukat A, Mongin SJ, Geisser MS, et al. . Long-term mortality after screening for colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2013;369(12):1106-1114. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1300720 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Park DI, Ryu S, Kim YH, et al. . Comparison of guaiac-based and quantitative immunochemical fecal occult blood testing in a population at average risk undergoing colorectal cancer screening. Am J Gastroenterol. 2010;105(9):2017-2025. doi:10.1038/ajg.2010.179 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types