Percutaneous or surgical revascularization for left main stem disease: NOBLE ideas, but do they EXCEL?

Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2019 May;17(5):361-368. doi: 10.1080/14779072.2019.1615445. Epub 2019 May 15.

Abstract

Introduction: Although coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) has traditionally been the standard treatment for significant left main stem (LMS) disease, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) using drug-eluting stents (DES) is now considered an acceptable alternative. Areas covered: This article aims to summarise the key findings of the landmark clinical trials on LMS revascularization and the recently published ESC/EACTS guidelines on myocardial revascularization related to LMS disease. Expert opinion: It is unlikely that there will be a further large randomized trial aimed at addressing the issue of the optimum method of revascularization for LMS disease. Both PCI and CABG are reasonable revascularization options for appropriately selected patients with LMS disease. 'Heart Team' approach is vital to guide the management of patients with LMS disease, when there is obvious clinical equipoise and a mandate for complete revascularization. With an aging and increasing co-morbid patient population, clinical equipoise may not always be obvious, making extrapolation of clinical trial results to the 'real world' difficult.

Keywords: EXCEL; Left main stem disease; MAIN COMPARE; NOBLE; SYNTAX; SYNTAXES; coronary artery bypass grafting; percutaneous coronary intervention; revascularization guidelines.

Publication types

  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Coronary Artery Bypass / methods*
  • Coronary Artery Disease / therapy*
  • Drug-Eluting Stents
  • Humans
  • Myocardial Revascularization / methods
  • Patient Selection
  • Percutaneous Coronary Intervention / methods*
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Vascular Surgical Procedures / methods