Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Aug;54(4):805-815.
doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13168. Epub 2019 May 16.

Do health insurance and hospital market concentration influence hospital patients' experience of care?

Affiliations

Do health insurance and hospital market concentration influence hospital patients' experience of care?

Caroline Hanson et al. Health Serv Res. 2019 Aug.

Abstract

Objective: To examine the effects of insurance and hospital market concentration on hospital patients' experience of care, as hospitals may compete on quality for favorable insurance contracts.

Data sources/study setting: Secondary data for 2008-2015 on patient experience from Hospital Compare's patient survey data, hospital characteristics from the American Hospital Association (AHA) Annual Survey, and insurance market characteristics from HealthLeaders-InterStudy.

Study design: Hospital/year-level regressions predict each hospital's patient experience measure as a function of insurance and hospital market concentration and hospital fixed effects. The model is identified by longitudinal variation in insurance and hospital concentration.

Data collection/extraction methods: Hospital/year-level data from Hospital Compare and the AHA merged by market/year to insurance and hospital concentration measures.

Principal findings: Changes in patient satisfaction are positively associated with increases in insurance concentration and negatively associated with increases in hospital concentration. Moving from a market with 20th percentile insurance concentration and 80th percentile hospital concentration to a market with 80th percentile insurance concentration and 20th percentile hospital concentration increases the share of patients that rated the hospital highly from 66.9 percent (95% CI: 66.5-67.2 percent) to 67.9 percent (95% CI: 67.5-68.3 percent) and the share of patients that definitely recommend the hospital from 69.7 percent (95% CI: 69.4-70.0 percent) to 70.8 percent (95% CI: 70.5-71.2 percent). The relationship for insurance concentration is stronger in more concentrated hospital markets, while the relationship for hospital concentration is stronger in less concentrated hospital markets.

Conclusions: These findings add to the evidence on the harms of hospital consolidation but suggest that insurer consolidation may improve patient experience.

Keywords: anti-trust/Health care markets/Competition; observational data/Quasi-experiments; patient assessment/satisfaction.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest to report and no other disclosures.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Predicted patient experience by level of insurance and hospital market concentration Note: The predicted values are based on the results shown in Table 1.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Gaynor M, Ho K, Town RJ. The industrial organization of health‐care markets. J Econ Lit. 2015;53(2):235‐284.
    1. Kessler DP, McClellan MB. Is hospital competition socially wasteful? Q J Econ. 2000;115(2):577‐615.
    1. Gaynor M, Moreno‐Serra R, Propper C. Death by market power: reform, competition, and patient outcomes in the national health service. Am Econ J: Econ Policy. 2013;5(4):134‐166.
    1. Escarce JJ, Jain AK, Rogowski J. Hospital competition, managed care, and mortality after hospitalization for medical conditions: evidence from three states. Med Care Res Rev. 2006;63(6):112S‐140S. - PubMed
    1. Cutler DM, Huckman RS, Kolstad JT. Input constraints and the efficiency of entry: lessons from cardiac surgery. Am Econ J: Econ Policy. 2010;2(1):51‐76.

Publication types

MeSH terms