Rigorous surveillance is necessary for high confidence in end-of-outbreak declarations for Ebola and other infectious diseases

Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2019 Jul 8;374(1776):20180431. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2018.0431.

Abstract

The World Health Organization considers an Ebola outbreak to have ended once 42 days have passed since the last possible exposure to a confirmed case. Benefits of a quick end-of-outbreak declaration, such as reductions in trade/travel restrictions, must be balanced against the chance of flare-ups from undetected residual cases. We show how epidemiological modelling can be used to estimate the surveillance level required for decision-makers to be confident that an outbreak is over. Results from a simple model characterizing an Ebola outbreak suggest that a surveillance sensitivity (i.e. case reporting percentage) of 79% is necessary for 95% confidence that an outbreak is over after 42 days without symptomatic cases. With weaker surveillance, unrecognized transmission may still occur: if the surveillance sensitivity is only 40%, then 62 days must be waited for 95% certainty. By quantifying the certainty in end-of-outbreak declarations, public health decision-makers can plan and communicate more effectively. This article is part of the theme issue 'Modelling infectious disease outbreaks in humans, animals and plants: epidemic forecasting and control'. This issue is linked with the earlier theme issue 'Modelling infectious disease outbreaks in humans, animals and plants: approaches and important themes'.

Keywords: Ebola virus disease; World Health Organization; end-of-outbreak declarations; outbreak forecasting; surveillance.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Disease Outbreaks / statistics & numerical data*
  • Hemorrhagic Fever, Ebola / epidemiology*
  • Humans
  • Models, Biological*
  • Population Surveillance*
  • Public Health Administration*

Associated data

  • figshare/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.4461014