Different depth-related polymerization kinetics of dual-cure, bulk-fill composites

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the polymerization kinetics qualitatively and quantitatively for dual-cure bulk-fill composites in comparison with light-cure bulk-fill and traditional incremental composites at two clinically relevant depths.

Methods: Five commercial dental composites were evaluated, including three dual-cure bulk-fill composites (BulkEZ, HyperFIL and Injectafil), one light-cure bulk-fill composite Filtek Bulk Fill Flowable (FBF) and one traditional incremental composite Filtek Z250 (Z250) as controls. Specimens were prepared in two different depths (0.5 mm and 5 mm) for 20 s light irradiation. Self-cure was also evaluated for the three dual-cure composites. The polymerization kinetics were measured continuously in real-time for at least 10 min using a Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) with an attenuated total reflectance (ATR) accessory. The experimental kinetic data were fitted using two mathematical models - a sigmoidal function and a superposition of two exponential functions characterizing the gel phase and glass phase. The degree of conversion (DC) and the rate of polymerization were calculated for all test conditions.

Results: Both experimental FTIR measurements and mathematical modeling revealed distinct depth-related polymerization kinetics for BulkEZ compared to the other two dual-cure composites. Specifically, BulkEZ exhibited moderately-paced polymerization kinetics at both depths while HyperFIL and Injectafil exhibited faster polymerization at 0.5 mm and slower polymerization at 5 mm. The bulk-fill FBF and incremental Z250 exhibited relatively fast polymerization at both depths, a characteristic for light-cure. The DC values at the two depths were not significantly different for BulkEZ, but significantly higher at 0.5 mm than at 5 mm for the other four composites (α = 0.05).

Significance: Polymerization kinetics and their depth variation for dual-cure bulk-fill composites are material dependent. The distinct depth-related polymerization kinetics revealed for BulkEZ compared to other composites may affect their contraction stress and clinical performance.

Keywords: Bulk-fill; Degree of conversion; Dental composites; Dual-cure; FTIR spectroscopy; Light-cure; Polymerization kinetics; Rate of polymerization.