Within-individual behavioural variability and division of labour in social insects
- PMID: 31127006
- DOI: 10.1242/jeb.190868
Within-individual behavioural variability and division of labour in social insects
Abstract
Division of labour, whereby individuals divide the workload in a group, is a recurrent property of social living. The current conceptual framework for division of labour in social insects is provided by the response-threshold model. This model posits that the differences between individuals (i.e. between-individual variability) in responsiveness to task-associated stimuli is a key feature for task specialisation. The consistency of individual behaviours (i.e. within-individual variability) in task performance represents an additional but little-considered component driving robust patterns of division of labour. On the one hand, the presence of workers with a high level of within-individual variability presumably allows colonies to rapidly adapt to external fluctuations. On the other hand, a reduced degree of within-individual variability promotes a stricter specialisation in task performance, thereby limiting the costs of task switching. The ideal balance between flexibility and canalisation probably varies depending on the developmental stage of the colony to satisfy its changing needs. Here, I introduce the main sources of within-individual variability in behaviours in social insects and I review neural correlates accompanying the changes in behavioural flexibility. I propose the hypothesis that the positive scaling between group size and the intensity of task specialisation, a relationship consistently reported both within and between taxa, may rely on reduced within-individual variability via self-organised processes linked to the quality of brood care. Overall, I emphasise the need for a more comprehensive characterisation of the response dynamics of individuals to better understand the mechanisms shaping division of labour in social insects.
Keywords: Ant; Group size; Ontogeny; Plasticity; Task specialisation.
© 2019. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interestsThe author declares no competing or financial interests.
Similar articles
-
Interindividual variability in social insects - proximate causes and ultimate consequences.Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2014 Aug;89(3):671-87. doi: 10.1111/brv.12074. Epub 2013 Dec 17. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2014. PMID: 24341677 Review.
-
Fitness benefits and emergent division of labour at the onset of group living.Nature. 2018 Aug;560(7720):635-638. doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0422-6. Epub 2018 Aug 22. Nature. 2018. PMID: 30135576 Free PMC article.
-
Molecular underpinnings of division of labour among workers in a socially complex termite.Sci Rep. 2021 Sep 14;11(1):18269. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-97515-w. Sci Rep. 2021. PMID: 34521896 Free PMC article.
-
Colony size affects division of labour in the ponerine ant Rhytidoponera metallica.Naturwissenschaften. 2003 Feb;90(2):88-92. doi: 10.1007/s00114-002-0396-x. Epub 2003 Jan 31. Naturwissenschaften. 2003. PMID: 12590305
-
Recurrent evolution of dependent colony foundation across eusocial insects.Annu Rev Entomol. 2013;58:37-55. doi: 10.1146/annurev-ento-120811-153643. Epub 2012 Aug 29. Annu Rev Entomol. 2013. PMID: 22934981 Review.
Cited by
-
The relationship between individual phenotype and the division of labour in naked mole-rats: it's complicated.PeerJ. 2020 Sep 29;8:e9891. doi: 10.7717/peerj.9891. eCollection 2020. PeerJ. 2020. PMID: 33062418 Free PMC article.
-
Response thresholds alone cannot explain empirical patterns of division of labor in social insects.PLoS Biol. 2021 Jun 17;19(6):e3001269. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3001269. eCollection 2021 Jun. PLoS Biol. 2021. PMID: 34138839 Free PMC article.
-
Individual consistency in the learning abilities of honey bees: cognitive specialization within sensory and reinforcement modalities.Anim Cogn. 2023 Jun;26(3):909-928. doi: 10.1007/s10071-022-01741-2. Epub 2023 Jan 6. Anim Cogn. 2023. PMID: 36609813 Free PMC article.
-
Behavior Individuality: A Focus on Drosophila melanogaster.Front Physiol. 2021 Nov 30;12:719038. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2021.719038. eCollection 2021. Front Physiol. 2021. PMID: 34916952 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Early social context does not influence behavioral variation at adulthood in ants.Curr Zool. 2021 Aug 3;68(3):335-344. doi: 10.1093/cz/zoab063. eCollection 2022 Jun. Curr Zool. 2021. PMID: 35592349 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
