Objectives: This paper aims to provide a theoretical clarification of the health informatics field by conducting a quantitative review analysis of the health informatics literature. And this paper aims to map scientific networks; to uncover the explicit and hidden patterns, knowledge structures, and sub-structures in scientific networks; to track the flow and burst of scientific topics; and to discover what effects they have on the scientific growth of health informatics.
Methods: This study was a quantitative literature review of the health informatics field, employing text mining and bibliometric research methods. This paper reviews 30,115 articles with health informatics as their topic, which are indexed in the Web of Science Core Collection Database from 1974 to 2018. This study analyzed and mapped four networks: author co-citation network, co-occurring author keywords and keywords plus, co-occurring subject categories, and country co-citation network. We used CiteSpace 5.3 and VOSviewer to analyze data, and we used Gephi 0.9.2 and VOSviewer to visualize the networks.
Results: This study found that the three major themes of the literature from 1974 to 2018 were the utilization of computer science in healthcare, the impact of health informatics on patient safety and the quality of healthcare, and decision support systems. The study found that, since 2016, health informatics has entered a new era to provide predictive, preventative, personalized, and participatory healthcare systems.
Conclusions: This study found that the future strands of research may be patient-generated health data, deep learning algorithms, quantified self and self-tracking tools, and Internet of Things based decision support systems.
Keywords: Algorithms; Data Mining; Machine Learning; Medical Informatics; Publications.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of Interest: No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.
Visualizing Collaboration Characteristics and Topic Burst on International Mobile Health Research: Bibliometric Analysis.JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2018 Jun 5;6(6):e135. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.9581. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2018. PMID: 29871851 Free PMC article.
Visualizing the knowledge structure and evolution of big data research in healthcare informatics.Int J Med Inform. 2017 Feb;98:22-32. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2016.11.006. Epub 2016 Nov 23. Int J Med Inform. 2017. PMID: 28034409 Review.
2016 Year-in-Review of Clinical and Consumer Informatics: Analysis and Visualization of Keywords and Topics.Healthc Inform Res. 2017 Apr;23(2):77-86. doi: 10.4258/hir.2017.23.2.77. Epub 2017 Apr 30. Healthc Inform Res. 2017. PMID: 28523205 Free PMC article. Review.
Web 2.0 applications in medicine: trends and topics in the literature.Med 2 0. 2015 Apr 1;4(1):e2. doi: 10.2196/med20.3628. Med 2 0. 2015. PMID: 25842175 Free PMC article.
Visualizing the intellectual structure and evolution of electronic health and telemedicine research.Int J Med Inform. 2019 Oct;130:103947. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.08.007. Epub 2019 Aug 13. Int J Med Inform. 2019. PMID: 31450080
Cited by 1 article
Artificial intelligence with multi-functional machine learning platform development for better healthcare and precision medicine.Database (Oxford). 2020 Jan 1;2020:baaa010. doi: 10.1093/database/baaa010. Database (Oxford). 2020. PMID: 32185396 Free PMC article.
- Carter CE, Veale BL. Digital radiography and PACS. St. Louis (MO): Mosby; 2008.
- Fitzgerald-Hayes M, Reichsman F. DNA and biotechnology. Boston (MA): Elsevier; 2010.
- Smallwood RF. Managing electronic records: Methods, best practices, and technologies. Hoboken (NJ): John Wiley & Sons; 2013.
- Ballweg R, Brown D, Vetrosky DT, Ritsema TS. Physician assistant: a guide to clinical practice. Philadelphia (PA): Elsevier; 2017.
- O'Carroll PW, Ripp LH, Yasnoff WA, Ward ME, Martin EL. Public health informatics and information systems. New York (NY): Springer; 2003.