Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 Apr;25(2):61-72.
doi: 10.4258/hir.2019.25.2.61. Epub 2019 Apr 30.

Analyzing and Visualizing Knowledge Structures of Health Informatics From 1974 to 2018: A Bibliometric and Social Network Analysis

Affiliations
Free PMC article
Review

Analyzing and Visualizing Knowledge Structures of Health Informatics From 1974 to 2018: A Bibliometric and Social Network Analysis

Tahereh Saheb et al. Healthc Inform Res. .
Free PMC article

Abstract

Objectives: This paper aims to provide a theoretical clarification of the health informatics field by conducting a quantitative review analysis of the health informatics literature. And this paper aims to map scientific networks; to uncover the explicit and hidden patterns, knowledge structures, and sub-structures in scientific networks; to track the flow and burst of scientific topics; and to discover what effects they have on the scientific growth of health informatics.

Methods: This study was a quantitative literature review of the health informatics field, employing text mining and bibliometric research methods. This paper reviews 30,115 articles with health informatics as their topic, which are indexed in the Web of Science Core Collection Database from 1974 to 2018. This study analyzed and mapped four networks: author co-citation network, co-occurring author keywords and keywords plus, co-occurring subject categories, and country co-citation network. We used CiteSpace 5.3 and VOSviewer to analyze data, and we used Gephi 0.9.2 and VOSviewer to visualize the networks.

Results: This study found that the three major themes of the literature from 1974 to 2018 were the utilization of computer science in healthcare, the impact of health informatics on patient safety and the quality of healthcare, and decision support systems. The study found that, since 2016, health informatics has entered a new era to provide predictive, preventative, personalized, and participatory healthcare systems.

Conclusions: This study found that the future strands of research may be patient-generated health data, deep learning algorithms, quantified self and self-tracking tools, and Internet of Things based decision support systems.

Keywords: Algorithms; Data Mining; Machine Learning; Medical Informatics; Publications.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Map of co-occurring keywords visualized by the Gephi software (top 30% per 5-year slice).
Figure 2
Figure 2. Overlay visualization of keywords from 2010 to 2018.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Visualization of countries' citation numbers and citation links with the other countries (top 30% per 5-year slice).
Figure 4
Figure 4. Co-occurring subject categories (top 30% per 5-year slice).
Figure 5
Figure 5. Visualization of author co-citation analysis based on modularity score.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by 1 article

References

    1. Carter CE, Veale BL. Digital radiography and PACS. St. Louis (MO): Mosby; 2008.
    1. Fitzgerald-Hayes M, Reichsman F. DNA and biotechnology. Boston (MA): Elsevier; 2010.
    1. Smallwood RF. Managing electronic records: Methods, best practices, and technologies. Hoboken (NJ): John Wiley & Sons; 2013.
    1. Ballweg R, Brown D, Vetrosky DT, Ritsema TS. Physician assistant: a guide to clinical practice. Philadelphia (PA): Elsevier; 2017.
    1. O'Carroll PW, Ripp LH, Yasnoff WA, Ward ME, Martin EL. Public health informatics and information systems. New York (NY): Springer; 2003.
Feedback