Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 May 8;6:66.
doi: 10.3389/fnut.2019.00066. eCollection 2019.

Impact of Whole, Fresh Fruit Consumption on Energy Intake and Adiposity: A Systematic Review

Affiliations
Free PMC article

Impact of Whole, Fresh Fruit Consumption on Energy Intake and Adiposity: A Systematic Review

Stephan J Guyenet. Front Nutr. .
Free PMC article

Abstract

Background: The energy content of whole, fresh fruit derives primarily from simple sugars, which are currently under heightened scrutiny for their potential contribution to obesity and chronic disease risk. Yet fruit also has a relatively low energy density, moderate palatability/reward value, and high fiber content, which together may limit energy intake. Although reasoned arguments can be made that fruit is fattening or slimming, the question is best resolved empirically. Methods: Methods were preregistered with PROSPERO (CRD42018111830). The primary outcome is the impact of whole, fresh fruit consumption on measures of adiposity including body weight in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Secondary outcomes are the impact of whole, fresh fruit consumption on energy intake in RCTs, and the association between whole, fresh fruit consumption and changes in measures of adiposity in prospective observational studies. CENTRAL and PubMed databases were searched through October 2018. Cochrane risk of bias tool was used to assess risk of bias in RCTs, and the GRADE method was used to judge and convey the certainty of conclusions. Reporting follows PRISMA guidelines. Results: RCTs, and particularly those of higher quality, suggest that increasing whole, fresh fruit consumption promotes weight maintenance or modest weight loss over periods of 3-24 weeks (moderate certainty), with limited evidence suggesting that a high intake of fruit favors weight loss among people with overweight or obesity. Consistent with this, single-meal RCTs suggest that consuming whole, fresh fruit tends to decrease energy intake, particularly when consumed prior to a meal or when displacing more energy-dense foods (moderate certainty). Prospective observational studies suggest that habitually higher fruit intake is not associated with weight change, or is associated with modest protection against weight gain, over five or more years. Conclusions: Current evidence suggests that whole, fresh fruit consumption is unlikely to contribute to excess energy intake and adiposity, but rather has little effect on these outcomes or constrains them modestly. Single-meal RCTs, RCTs lasting 3-24 weeks, and long-term observational studies are relatively consistent in supporting this conclusion. Whole, fresh fruit probably does not contribute to obesity and may have a place in the prevention and management of excess adiposity.

Keywords: adiposity; body weight; energy intake; fruit; obesity; sugar.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
PRISMA flow diagram summarizing the study identification and selection process.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Risk of bias graph for the primary outcome: the impact of whole, fresh fruit consumption on measures of body weight and adiposity in RCTs. Bars illustrate the proportion of trials that received a particular risk of bias score in each risk of bias domain.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Risk of bias summary for individual trials contributing to the primary outcome: the impact of whole, fresh fruit consumption on measures of body weight and adiposity in RCTs. Colored dots represent low risk (green), unclear risk (yellow), and high risk (red) in each risk of bias domain for each trial.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Risk of bias graph for a secondary outcome: the impact of whole, fresh fruit consumption on energy intake in RCTs. Bars illustrate the proportion of trials that received a particular risk of bias score in each risk of bias domain.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Risk of bias summary for individual trials contributing to a secondary outcome: the impact of whole, fresh fruit consumption on energy intake in RCTs. Colored dots represent low risk (green), unclear risk (yellow), and high risk (red) in each risk of bias domain for each trial.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by 1 article

References

    1. Murray CJL, Vos T, Lozano R, Naghavi M, Flaxman AD, Michaud C, et al. . Disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) for 291 diseases and injuries in 21 regions, 1990-2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet. (2012) 380:2197–223. 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61690-0 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Trowell HC, Burkitt DP. Western Diseases: Their Emergence and Prevention. Harvard University Press; (1981). 474 p.
    1. Knowler WC, Barrett-Connor E, Fowler SE, Hamman RF, Lachin JM, Walker EA, et al. Reduction in the incidence of type 2 diabetes with lifestyle intervention or metformin. N Engl J Med. (2002) 346:393–403. 10.1056/NEJMoa012512 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hall KD, Guo J. Obesity energetics: body weight regulation and the effects of diet composition. Gastroenterology. (2017) 152:1718–27.e3. 10.1053/j.gastro.2017.01.052 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fontana L, Meyer TE, Klein S, Holloszy JO. Long-term calorie restriction is highly effective in reducing the risk for atherosclerosis in humans. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. (2004) 101:6659–63. 10.1073/pnas.0308291101 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources

Feedback